How Do You Calculate Fragment Velocities Post-Explosion in Projectile Motion?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the fragment velocities post-explosion in projectile motion, the conservation of momentum principle is applied. The initial momentum of the projectile is set equal to the combined momentum of the fragments A and B after the explosion. The horizontal momentum equation is established, but it highlights the need for an additional equation to solve for the two unknown velocities. Participants suggest incorporating conservation of momentum in the vertical direction to create a system of independent equations. This approach will help determine the magnitude of each fragment's velocity and the horizontal distance where fragment A strikes the ground.
red123
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 4-kg projectile travels with a horizontal velocity of 600 m/s before it explodes and breaks into two fragments A and B of mass 1.5 kg and 2.5 kg, respectively. If the fragments travel along the parabolic trajectories shown, determine the magnitude of velocity of each fragment just after the explosion and the horizontal distance dA where segment A strikes the ground at C.

2v8jxhy.jpg


Homework Equations



mAVA1x + mBVB1x = mAVA2x + mBVB2x

The Attempt at a Solution



(1.5 kg)(600 m/s) + (2.5 kg)(600 m/s) = (1.5 kg) VA2cos(45) + (2.5 kg) VB2cos(30)

2400 kg m/s = (1.5cos(45) kg) VA2 + (2.5cos(30) kg) VB2

9hly76.gif


vhx8xu.png


Solving two unknowns?
 

Attachments

  • 2v8jxhy.jpg
    2v8jxhy.jpg
    7.7 KB · Views: 759
  • 9hly76.gif
    9hly76.gif
    1.7 KB · Views: 757
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you have 2 equations that are both derived from a third one, they aren't independent. So you're stil one equation short. Try conservation of momentum in the vertical direction.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top