How Do You Calculate I_2 and I_4 Using Kirchoff's Rules?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ttiger2k7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rules
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating currents I_2 and I_4 using Kirchhoff's Rules in a given circuit. The initial calculation for I_2 was determined to be 2.2 A, but further clarification revealed it should actually be 4.2 A. Participants emphasized the importance of applying Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) to find I_4, leading to the equation 12 V - 4.2*2 - 3I_4 = 0. Ultimately, the calculated value for I_4 was found to be 1.20 A. The thread illustrates the application of Kirchhoff's Rules effectively in circuit analysis.
ttiger2k7
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Using Kirchoff's Rules

Homework Statement



http://img266.imageshack.us/img266/4120/kirchoffho1.gif
In the circuit, I_1 = 1.6 A. Find the value of: (a) the current I_2 and (b) the current I_4.

Homework Equations



Junction Rule, Loop Rule, V=IR

The Attempt at a Solution



Small loop, top left:

2V + (2ohms)(I_2) - (4ohms)(1.6 A) = 0
(2 ohms)(I_2) - (6.4) = -2
2 ohms * I_2 = 4.4
I_2 = 2.2 A

That also means that the current in the entire circuit is 4.4 Amps.

...Right?

That is as far as I got. Assuming my answer for I_2 is correct, all I have to do is find I_4, which I am stumped on how to do. Should I combine the two resistors on the top left, since they're in series?

Homework Statement


Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Small loop, top left:(moving anti-clockwise)

2+ 4*1.6-2i_2=0
i_2 =4.2 A

Should I combine the two resistors on the top left, since they're in series?

I don't think any two resistors in this circuit are in series :redface:
 
So that means, I got something that *roughly* looks like the following:

http://img297.imageshack.us/img297/7287/kirchoffeditck6.gif
(horrible MS paint editting by me)

So that means total I will be 5.8 (1.6 + 4.2).

Should I now do a loop rule for the whole circuit, calling the smaller loop Ir (where r is the total resistence of the right loop)? Then just solve for R using r and I?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So that means, I got something that *roughly* looks like the following

No I don't think so. The resistances are neither in series nor parallel. You'll have to use KVL.
Should I now do a loop rule for the whole circuit, calling the smaller loop Ir (where r is the total resistence of the right loop)? Then just solve for R using r and I?

In the circuit, I_1 = 1.6 A. Find the value of: (a) the current I_2 and (b) the current I_4.

The question doesn't ask you to find R. Only i_2 and i_4
Just use loop rule in lower big loop to find i_4 .
 
Thanks. Got it!

12 V - 4.2*2 - 3I_4 = 0

I_4 = 1.20 A
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top