How Do You Calculate Investment Percentage Changes Correctly?

  • Thread starter Thread starter grandnat_6
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Loss
grandnat_6
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I think I confused myself. Must be working too hard or something.

I trying to find the percentage gain or loss of an investment.

example:

1. orginal investment $10000.00 today $9,500.00

9,500.00/10,000.00 = .95*100 = 95%

Therefore I have 95% of my orginal amount or (100%-95%)= 5% loss.

10,000.00*-5%= -500

10,000.00-500= 9,500.00

Or:

10,000.00-9,500.00= 500.00

500.00/9,500.00= .05263*100=5.263%

9500*5.263=500

500+9,500.00= 10,000.00

Please straighten me out on this! They both seem to get me the correct answer but the percentages are different, which one is correct?

What if I started out with $9,500.00 and today it's $10,000.00?

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
grandnat_6 said:
Hi,

I think I confused myself. Must be working too hard or something.

I trying to find the percentage gain or loss of an investment.

example:

1. orginal investment $10000.00 today $9,500.00

9,500.00/10,000.00 = .95*100 = 95%

Therefore I have 95% of my orginal amount or (100%-95%)= 5% loss.

10,000.00*-5%= -500

10,000.00-500= 9,500.00

Or:

10,000.00-9,500.00= 500.00

500.00/9,500.00= .05263*100=5.263%

9500*5.263=500

500+9,500.00= 10,000.00

Please straighten me out on this! They both seem to get me the correct answer but the percentages are different, which one is correct?

What if I started out with $9,500.00 and today it's $10,000.00?

Thanks.


UIt is not the same way up as way down in percentages:

if you began with $10,000.00 and after some time you have $9, 500.00 then you've lost 5% of your original invesment, as
$$\frac{9,500}{10,000}=0.05\Longrightarrow 0.05\cdot 100 \%=5\%\,\,\text{loss}$$
as the final amount is less than the first one.

Had you begun with $9,500.00 and after some time you had $10,000,, then you'd have won
$$\frac{10,000}{9,500}=1.05263\Longrightarrow (1-1.05263)\cdot 100\%=5.6263\%\,\,\text{profit}$$

DonAntonio
 
The "percentage change" is always relative to the initial amount. Going from 10000 to 9500 is a decrease of 500 so a percentage change of -500/10000= -.05 or -5% of 10000.

But an increase from 9500 up to 10000 is an increase of 500 and so a percentage change of 500/9500= .0526 or 5.26%.
 
Thanks for the help! I understand now.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top