How Do You Calculate Linear Acceleration from Wheel Diameter and RPM Changes?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate linear acceleration from wheel diameter and RPM changes, first convert RPM to radians per second. For the bicycle problem, the angular acceleration can be found using the change in angular velocity over time, and then linear acceleration can be derived using the relationship between linear and angular acceleration, factoring in the wheel's radius. In the car scenario, the relationship between linear and angular motion allows for the calculation of angular acceleration based on the change in speed and the number of revolutions. Understanding these relationships is crucial for solving both problems effectively. Properly applying these principles will yield the desired linear and angular acceleration values.
icg
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey everyone, first time poster here:smile: It's a really great forum though!

I can't seem to figure out this problem. If anyone could help that would be great.


1.A bicycle has wheels with a diameter of 0.650 m. It accelerates uniformly and the rate of rotation of its wheels increases from 177rpm to 275rpm in a time of 18.5 s. Find the linear acceleration of the bicycle.


I converted rpm to rad/s, and then found angular acceleration using a=vf-vi/t, but how do you find the linear acceleration given the diameter.


And there's also this one:

2.The tires of a car make 78.0 revolutions as the car reduces its speed uniformly from 92.5 km/hr to 55.9 km/hr. The tires have a diameter of 0.908 m. What was the angular acceleration?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you start with the definition of an angle as the ratio of arc length to radius, you see that the distance the center of a wheel moves when roilling without slipping is proportional to its angular displacement (rotation in radians). It follows that linear velocity is proportional to angular velocity and linear acceleration is probportional to angular acceleration. Can you come up with these relationships?
 
The radius is half the diameter, isn't it? ;)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top