How Do You Calculate Moment of Inertia for Different Axes?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the moment of inertia about an axis through mass A, the formula I = mr^2 is applied, but distances must be squared, and the total mass should not be divided. For the axis through masses B and C, the Pythagorean theorem is used to find the distance, which is then squared in the moment of inertia calculation. The correct approach involves summing the individual moments of inertia for each mass around the specified axis. The initial confusion stemmed from an incorrect attempt to find the center of mass, which is not relevant for this calculation. Properly applying the formulas leads to accurate results for the moment of inertia.
mcnealymt
Messages
35
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



a)Find the moment of inertia about an axis that passes through mass A and is perpendicular to the page. In kg m^2

b)Find the moment of inertia about an axis that passes through masses B and C.In kg m^2

http://session.masteringphysics.com/problemAsset/1070524/4/12.EX16.jpg

Homework Equations



I=mr^2

The Attempt at a Solution



a) (Mass of a * r + Mass of b * r)/ (Total Mass)

.005 They wanted the answer in two sigfigs so I put .05*10^-1 and it was wrong.

b) Used Pythagorean Theorem

sqrt(.10^2- .062)= .08
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
mcnealymt said:
I=mr^2
Good. Just find I for each mass (around the given axis) and add them up to get the total I.

a) (Mass of a * r + Mass of b * r)/ (Total Mass)
You forgot to square the distances. What distance did you use? And why did you divide by the total mass?
 
Doc Al said:
Good. Just find I for each mass (around the given axis) and add them up to get the total I.


You forgot to square the distances. What distance did you use? And why did you divide by the total mass?
That makes sense, for some reason I was trying to find the center of mass which is completely irrelevant.

The distances I used were for a were: (.1kg)(.1m)^2+ (.1kg)(.1m)^2


The distance used for b was .08m (found using Pythagorean)
(.08m)^2(.2kg)
 
Thank you Doc Al, I appreciate it. Have a nice day.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top