How Do You Calculate Resulting Velocity Vectors in 3D Collisions?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate resulting velocity vectors in 3D collisions, one must consider the normal vectors, masses, and velocities of the colliding objects, as well as their bounciness or stiffness. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding elastic collisions, which can be extended from 1D to 3D by resolving velocities and momenta into three orthogonal directions. While physics problems often simplify collisions to a single plane, real-world scenarios may involve inelastic collisions where objects do not bounce perfectly. For less serious projects, such as games, a simplified approach using random direction changes while maintaining overall momentum can be effective. Understanding these principles provides a solid foundation for tackling complex collision calculations in simulations.
MinatureCook
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey, I've done quite a bit of Mechanics work in the past... But I really don't even know where to start here.

For some work I'm doing, I need to calculate the resulting velocity vectors when 2 objects collide. These 2 objects can be any shape, any mass and going at any velocity independently. (The simulation is in 3D, so x, y, z)

I suppose I'd have to calculate the normal of the two objects, do something with their velocity vectors and masses... And I suppose it would also depend on the objects' bounciness/stiffness etc...

If anyone could give me the names of some equations I can look into? Or any sort of help... Really just a place to start would be great.

Thanks for any help,
Stephen
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Commonly called a Billiard ball collision.
 
I'm Googling that term now, apparently it's also called "Elastic Collision" which is a great help (I had no idea of what to even start searching before) - but all of the equations seem to be confined to a 1D plane of movement.

Would it just be a matter of making the velocity vectors 3D? Here's to hoping so - it's just things rarely are so simple when transferring over to 3 dimensions in Maths :rolleyes:

Edit:
Ahh, actually - I just found this Wikipedia article
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elastic_collision
Which explains about 2D and 3D at the bottom. It's not as simple, but neither is it beyond my knowledge - so I'm happy there :P

Thanks a lot for the help; I genuinely wouldn't have known where to start looking without that
 
Last edited:
Perfectly OK to just go to 3 dimensions. Or as many as you like ;-)

You just have to resolve the velocities and momenta into 3 orthogonal directions.

Of course, you rarely have to do that in physics problems because any collision between two particles is only in 1 plane, even when it's a glancing collision.

You might want to consider inelastic collision - in the real world things tend to splat more than they bounce.

If it's not a serious project ( a game for example) you could equally well 'fake it'. Just use random direction changes and keep the total momentum/ energy constant (or lose a bit - inelastic). No need to meticulously work out contact angles.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
I know that mass does not affect the acceleration in a simple pendulum undergoing SHM, but how does the mass on the spring that makes up the elastic pendulum affect its acceleration? Certainly, there must be a change due to the displacement from equilibrium caused by each differing mass? I am talking about finding the acceleration at a specific time on each trial with different masses and comparing them. How would they compare and why?
Back
Top