How Do You Calculate Speed and Uncertainty with Given Measurements?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Alipepsi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Uncertainty
AI Thread Summary
To calculate speed and uncertainty, the formula v = d/t is used, where distance is 228 cm with an uncertainty of ±0.5 cm and time is 2.99 s with an uncertainty of ±0.5 s. The user conducted 15 trials, yielding a total speed of 44.99 s, leading to an average speed of 2.99 m/s. The user attempted to calculate the percentage uncertainties for both distance and time, resulting in confusion over the final speed calculation. Assistance is sought to clarify the correct method for determining speed and its associated uncertainties.
Alipepsi
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hey there, I need some help with uncertainties and how to find the speed of a moving object. I have tried to solve the problem several times but my answer seems to be wrong.

Formula for speed : v=d/t
My uncertainties: 0.5cm (distance) and 0.5s for time. The uncertainties were measured with the same analog.
I did the experiment 15 times and got different speed result of the object each time. The total sum of the speeds ( 15 trials) was 44.99s. The average of that is 2.99 (15/44.99)
Oh and my measuring device was 228cm long (exact)

I need to find out the speed and the uncertainties
If I missed any detail please please let me know
PLEASE HELP! I'am very frustrated right now..=S


Homework Equations



Formula to use : v=d/t

The Attempt at a Solution



v=d/t
= (228 +\- 0.5)m/(2.99+\- 0.5)s
228 divided by 0.5 = 456%
2.99 divided by 0.5= 5.78%
456% +5.78%=461.98%

so now 461.98% * 76.2 ( which I got by diving 288 and 2.99)
my final answer was v=76.25m? +\- 39%..
I'am confused..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually spend hours on trying to solve this :S
Help will be greatly appreciated!
 
anyone?
 
Check out this site here: http://www.rit.edu/cos/uphysics/uncertainties/Uncertaintiespart2.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Okey, thanks
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Finding uncertainty of a measurement
Replies
1
Views
1K
Help calculating the uncertainty in the Sun's rotational speed
Replies
4
Views
2K
How to Combine Gradient Uncertainty with other Uncertainty?
Replies
3
Views
2K
I Reported uncertainties for time and distance in physics experiment
Replies
1
Views
1K
When Do I Use Reading Error in Measurement Uncertainty?
Replies
8
Views
2K
Understanding Time Measurement in Physics: Uncertainty and Calculations
Replies
6
Views
2K
B Energy-time uncertainty relation for a volume and macroscopic objects?
Replies
2
Views
360
How to appropriately assign sigma values (uncertainty)
Replies
9
Views
2K
How to Calculate Resistors in Parallel Uncertainty
Replies
3
Views
5K
Propagating uncertainty when calculating acceleration due to gravity?
Replies
3
Views
11K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top