How Do You Calculate Stoichiometric Coefficients in Natural Gas Combustion?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate stoichiometric coefficients in natural gas combustion, one must set up a balanced chemical equation based on the components of the gas. The user presents an equation involving various natural gas components and notes the need for additional equations to solve for the coefficients. They mention using conservation of mass to derive five equations but require seven to find a solution. The discussion also touches on the concept of "moral analysis" in chemistry, though it remains unclear in this context. Overall, the focus is on achieving a complete combustion equation for natural gas.
physicophile
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I had a question on how to find the stoichimoteric coefficient in combustion reaction contains several types of natural gas.

Lets say for example: u start with a natural gas (using moral analysis) 0.865CO2 + a0.08C3H8 + b0.02C3H8 c0.035N2 + d(O2 + 3.76) ------> eCO2 + fH20 + gN2;

Using conseration of mass i get 4 equations + assume that i am start with one mole (0.865 + 0.08a + b0.02 + c0.035 = 1

that give me 5 equations but i need 7 equations to solve. We are told nothing about the end product, expect that it goes to completion with expess air.



Could some please help me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
never mind dumb question...the rhs are constants!
 
What is moral analysis of the gas?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top