How Do You Calculate Tension in a Two-Block Pulley System?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kristen151027
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
In a two-block pulley system with different masses, the tension in the rope is determined by the weight of both blocks and their motion. Using Newton's second law, the tension can be calculated by analyzing the forces acting on each block, where the heavier block creates more tension. The net force results from the difference in weights, leading to a tension value that is between the weights of the two blocks. It is essential to create separate equations for each block to accurately represent the forces at play. Ultimately, the correct answer to the tension's magnitude is a value between the weights of the two blocks.
kristen151027
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
Here is the question:

Two blocks of different mass are connected by a massless rope which goes over a massless, frictionless pulley. The rope is free to move, and both of the blocks hang vertically. What is the magnitude of the tension in the rope?

(a) the weight of the heavier block
(b) the weight of the lighter block
(c) their combined weight
(d) a value between the two weights
(e) zero

It's probably pretty easy for most of you, but I'm new to this stuff :-)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you use Newton's second law to formulate an equation to represent the motion of each mass? I would recommend starting with a free body diagram showing all the forces acting.
 
I understand that, but I can't decide whether to add the two tension forces or average them.
 
kristen151027 said:
I understand that, but I can't decide whether to add the two tension forces or average them.
Can you show me your equations?
 
Well, Newton's second law states that: F = ma
For each one, the sum of the forces is the T + (-mg), so T + (-mg) = ma
T = mg + ma
T = m (g + a)
So, the heavier block creates more tension on the rope.
Other than that, I'm clueless.
 
kristen151027 said:
I understand that, but I can't decide whether to add the two tension forces or average them.

There are NOT two tensions - there is only one. To have "tension" in a wire or rope, you have to have forces in both directions, of equal strength and opposite directions. First calculate the weight (downward force) of each mass. The difference in weights will be net force on the system- the heavier block moves downward, the lighter block moves upward. That means that the heavier block is moving downward but not as fast as if the smaller block weren't there. That's because its weight is offset by the weight of the smaller block. Of course, the smaller weight is not going down but up- that's because the weight of the smaller block minus the weight of the larger is negative. That common value, ignoring the direction, is the tension.
 
You should have two separate equations. The equation you have there represents the lighter block, where the tension is in the same direction as the motion (i.e. upwards towards the pulley) and the force of gravity opposes motion. Can you now write a separate equation representing the heavier block?
 
Hootenanny said:
Can you now write a separate equation representing the heavier block?

T + mg = ma
T = m(a-g)

And in response to HallsOfIvy, the "common value" you're referring to is, in effect, a value between the weight of the two blocks?
 
kristen151027 said:
T + mg = ma
T = m(a-g)
You may wish to reconsider this. In the case of the heavier block the sum of the forces is thus; \sum F = Mg - T can you see why?
kristen151027 said:
And in response to HallsOfIvy, the "common value" you're referring to is, in effect, a value between the weight of the two blocks?
This is correct :smile:
 
  • #10
Hootenanny said:
You may wish to reconsider this. In the case of the heavier block the sum of the forces is thus; \sum F = Mg - T can you see why?

Yes, because, as HallsofIvy said, "the heavier block is moving downward but not as fast as if the smaller block weren't there. That's because its weight is offset by the weight of the smaller block." Is that the correct reasoning?

And the answer, I just want to make clear, is (d) a value between the two weights.
 
  • #11
kristen151027 said:
Yes, because, as HallsofIvy said, "the heavier block is moving downward but not as fast as if the smaller block weren't there. That's because its weight is offset by the weight of the smaller block." Is that the correct reasoning?
In a round-a-bout way, yes. If you were to draw a free body diagram of the heavier block you would see two forces acting; gravity pulling the block downwards (in the same direction as the motion) and the tension acting upwards.
kristen151027 said:
And the answer, I just want to make clear, is (d) a value between the two weights.
That is correct.:smile:
 
  • #12
Thank you very much for your help!
 
  • #13
kristen151027 said:
Thank you very much for your help!
My pleasure:smile:
 
Back
Top