How Do You Calculate the Area of an Ellipse from Pericenter to Pi/2?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cfin3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Area Ellipse
cfin3
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have an orbital mechanics problem, in which I need to find the area of the ellipse from pericenter to pi/2 (semi-latus rectum location).


Homework Equations



So I have the orbit equation
r = p/(1+e*cos(theta)) where the origin is at the focus. So I know that A = integral( 1/2 * r^2 * d_theta) from 0-> pi/2.


The Attempt at a Solution



The problem is when plugging in r I can't integrate it. I need to account for the fact that 0=<e=<1 also. I have read many many other posts and searched on this topic but haven't found a concise answer.


Thanks for the help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I know it may sound unintuitive, by you might want to try performing the integration in a Cartesian form.

Given a semi-latus rectum p and eccentricity e, the semi major and minor axes are:

a = p/(1 - e2) and b = sqrt(ap)

The distance from the center of the ellipse to the focus is sqrt(a2 - b2).

The equation of the ellipse in Cartesian form is x2/a2 + y2/b2 = 1 .

Then follow the example shown http://math.ucsd.edu/~wgarner/math10b/area_ellipse.htm" with the appropriate domain for x.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top