How Do You Calculate the Electric Field at the Midpoint Between Two Charges?

  • Thread starter Thread starter J89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charges
J89
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Three charges are at the corners of an equilateral triangle, as shown in the figure below. Calculate the electric field at a point midway between the two charges on the x-axis.

Magnitude:
Direction below the x-axis in degrees.



Homework Equations



F=Ke*q/(h)^2


The Attempt at a Solution


What I did 1st is since the charge 3.00 is in the midpoint..calculated .500sin60 to get .434
..then I just plugged it in the formula 8.99*10^9 * 3.00*10-6/(.434)^2 to get 144 N

for the two charges on the x axis..

I just divided the distance .500 by 2 to get .250 m and plugged in each charge seperately. I got 1.15*10^3 N and 719 N. Would you have to add them all up to get the total magnitude..and for the direction, I think you need to divide the two charges on the x-axis and take arc tan right? I'm not too sure, but I keep getting this wrong..someone please help.
 

Attachments

  • 15-p-010.gif
    15-p-010.gif
    3.2 KB · Views: 506
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to remember that all quantities are vectors. So for the total magnitude you can only add the vectors.

Try sorting the numbers you got to the correct component of the Electric field vector.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top