How Do You Calculate the Force Between Children on Ice?

  • Thread starter Thread starter AliciaNoogles
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Two masses
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the force between three children being pulled on ice by a larger boy. The first part of the problem, which involved finding the acceleration, was solved correctly at 2.25 m/s². The challenge arose in determining the force each pair of children needed to hold hands to maintain their connection. The correct approach involved using the combined mass of the two children being accelerated, leading to the realization that the masses of the other children needed to be considered. Ultimately, the participant successfully resolved the issue and expressed gratitude for the assistance.
AliciaNoogles
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Three small children of mass, 20kg (first child),24kg(middle child) and 16kg (third child), respectively, hold hands and are pulled across a smooth frozen pond (which will occur sooner rather than later) by a larger boy on skates. He pulls thm via horizontal rope being held by the first child (20kg). The skater pulls on the rope with a force of 135N. Calculate each of the following :
-the acceleration of the skater
-the force with which each pair of children must hold hands to ensure that the chain is not broken.

Homework Equations



Fnet=ma

The Attempt at a Solution


I've solved the first part, which was 2.25, but for some reason i can't seem to get the right answer for the second part (90.0N, 36.0N). I've tried using Fnet=ma for the second part aswell, and haven't thought up anything else. I'm studying for a test, which is why I need to figure out how to do this, any help would be very much appreciated!

Never mind! i figured it out!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What numbers are you using in the F=ma formula?
 
I was adding the 20 and 24 and then multiplying by acceleration. I understand what I was doing wrong now, regardless, thank you for answering so fast!
 
I'm glad you found the right answer.

You came to the conclusion that you add the 24 and 16 together instead, because those are the masses being accelerated, right?
 
yes I did. Took me longer than I'm proud of though haha. Thanks
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top