How Do You Calculate the Moment of Inertia for a 5'10, 165lb Male?

thatsamazing10
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am having a lot of trouble trying to find the moment of inertia of myself, a male 5'10", and 165lbs. It seems as if it should be simple but am unsure how to take this one on. Any help would be great thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello thatsamazing10 :cool:

The moment of inertia will certainly depened on the posture (does the person spread his legs/arms?). I'm not sure about the mass distribution in a human body and haven't found a scheme for usual limb masses yet. Maybe the biologists in this forum can help you out with that? :smile:

But for an easy start you might assume an even mass distribution along a cylinder before trying to model more difficult postures.

Regards,

nazzard
 
It's not really a cylinder... I would say it's more of a rectangular prism
 
Office_Shredder said:
It's not really a cylinder... I would say it's more of a rectangular prism

Just had a look in the mirror :rolleyes: ... and ... you are right! I do look like a prism! :redface:

Now, calculating a lollipop-shape would be cool! :cool:
 
Last edited:
I've found a nice poster which might be helpful. Several methods for determining the moment of inertia along certain axes are discussed.

http://www.univ-valenciennes.fr/congres/3D2006/Posters/Poster%20-%20Damavandi.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top