How Do You Calculate the Net Electrostatic Force in a Three-Point Charge System?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the net electrostatic force on the charge at x = +3.0m, the forces between the three charges must be determined using Coulomb's law. The user calculated forces F1 and F2 but struggled with applying trigonometry to find the resultant force. It was suggested to consider the contributions from both the +18 uC and -12 uC charges to the +45 uC charge, using Pythagorean theorem for the resultant force. The user is encouraged to clarify the distances and angles involved to accurately compute the net force. Properly applying these principles will lead to the correct determination of the net electrostatic force.
duki
Messages
264
Reaction score
0
Problem:

A charge of +18 uC is on the y-axis at y = +3.0m. A charge of -12 uC is at the origin. Last, a charge of +45 uC is on the x-axis at x = +3.0m. Determine the magnitude and direction of the net electrostatic force on the charge at x = +3.0mm. Specify the direction relative to the -x axis.


So what I have drawn is:

O-> 18 x (10)^-6
|
|
| /\
| 3.0m
| \/
|
|
|
|
| Origin Charge: -12x10^-6
|O_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ O -> 45 x (10)^-6
< 3.om >

So I did:

F1 = (8.99 x 10^9)(12 x 10^-6)(18 x 10^-6) / 9 = 1.942 N
F2 = (8.99 x 10^9)(12 x 10^-6)(45 x 10^-6) / 9 = 0.539 N

Can I use trig to determine the magnitude now? I tried it but I got this:

1.942cos90 = 0
1.942sin90 = 1

Surely I've messed up somewhere. Can someone point me in the right direction?

Thanks a bunch! :smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
or would I do:

.539 cos 45
.539 sin 45
 
If you're finding the force on the charge at x=3m, you need 18x45 and -12x45 (with appropriate powers of 10, of course), and use pythagoras to find the distance between the 18uC and 45uC charges.

To find the magnitude, find the resultant force in the x and y directions, then use pythagoras.
 
Ok so I've done some of it right?

Then I do:

(3²)(3²) = 9² = 9??

i don't understand the second part
 
*bump*...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top