How Do You Calculate the Net Electrostatic Force on a Central Charge?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the net electrostatic force on a central charge of -3.00 µC, the forces from two surrounding charges, -4.00 µC (north) and +5.00 µC (east), must be considered using Coulomb's Law. The resultant force can be determined by calculating the individual forces and then applying the Pythagorean theorem to find the magnitude. The angle of the resultant force relative to due east can be found using the arctangent function. A scale drawing of the vectors and the parallelogram law can aid in visualizing and calculating the net force. Proper diagram accuracy is crucial for determining the correct lengths and angles involved.
keemosabi
Messages
109
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A charge of -3.00 µC is fixed at the center of a compass. Two additional charges are fixed on the circle of the compass (radius = 0.125 m). The charges on the circle are -4.00 µC at the position due north and +5.00 µC at the position due east. What is the magnitude and direction of the net electrostatic force acting on the charge at the center? Specify the direction relative to due east (0°).

http://g.imagehost.org/download/0048/force Click for a bigger image.


I used Couloumb's Law to get the above picture, but what do I do now?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, you seem to have found the resultant vector. That's the right idea. Don't you have a theorem from geometry that will let you figure its length from the other two? (Hint c^2 = a^2 + b^2)
The angle involves the arctangent.
 
AEM said:
Well, you seem to have found the resultant vector. That's the right idea. Don't you have a theorem from geometry that will let you figure its length from the other two? (Hint c^2 = a^2 + b^2)
The angle involves the arctangent.
How do I know the side length of the dotted line? It looks shorter than the 6.912 across from it.
 
keemosabi said:
How do I know the side length of the dotted line? It looks shorter than the 6.912 across from it.

Well, it seems to me that you have been too sloppy with your diagram. You will have a vector to the right representing the force of the charge to the East on the charge in the center and a vector down representing the force due to the charge to the north. You've computed these values. Make a scale drawing of the vectors and then use the parallelogram law for addition of the vectors. The diagonal of the parallelogram is the resultant. Here your parallelogram will be a rectangle and you can easily figure out its length.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top