How Do You Calculate the Potential Difference in a Charged Spherical Insulator?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the potential difference in a charged spherical insulator, use Gauss's law to determine the electric field. For a solid insulating sphere, the electric field inside and outside is derived from the symmetry of the sphere, leading to the equation E = Qenc/(4πEo r^2). The potential difference can be found by evaluating the negative line integral of the electric field from the point outside the sphere (0.64 meters) to the center. This approach simplifies the calculation by using a spherical Gaussian surface. Completing the integral will yield the potential difference between the center and the specified point.
deerhunt713
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
A solid insulating sphere has radius a = 3.2 meters and total charge Q = 3.6 Coulomb's. Calculate the potential difference between the center of the sphere and a point r = 0.64 meters from the center of the sphere. (A positive answer represents the center is at a lower potential, a negative answer corresponds to the center being at a higher potential.)



a similar problem was solved for a cylinder as an example, but i am unable to figure out how to solve for a sphere. please help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use gauss's law to work out the electric field produced by the sphere as the sphere has symmetry. The field inside an insulating sphere is the same as the field outside it so we don't have to worry about the fields being different, the field we get from gauss's law is a general result. Now all you need to calculate is the negative line integral of the electric field from the point outside the sphere to the point at the centre. This is the potential difference between the outside point and the centre.
 
im still having trouble/ not completely grasping the concepts. pls help its due in the morning
 
\oint E.da = Qenc/Eo

Where Qenc is the charge enclosed within the surface and Eo is the permitivity of free space.

Because the field has symmetry, in this case spherical, we can simplify the above equation to:

E\ointda = Qenc/Eo

Which becomes:

E A = Qenc/Eo

Where A is the area of the gaussian surface.

So now we put a sphereical gaussian surface around the sphere so that it is totally enclosed. So A = 4\pir^2, the area of a sphere.

So we get the equation for the electric field to be:

E = Qenc/4\piEo r^2

This holds for any straight line directed radially outward from the centre of the sphere because the sphere has sphereical symmetry.

Now the potential is given by:

V = -\intE.dl

You need to evaulate it from 0.64 to 0 to find the potential difference. Will leave that part to you :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top