How Do You Calculate the Potential Energy of a Uniformly Charged Sphere?

ffdbzathf
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A spherical volume of radius, a, is filled with charge of uniform density, p. We want to know the potential energy, U, of this sphere of charge, that is, the work done in assembling it. Calculate it by building the sphere up layer by layer, making use of the fact that the field outside a spherical distribution of charge is the same as if all the charge were at the center. Express the result in terms of the total charge, Q, in the sphere.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That was a nice rendition of your exercise question!

Now, going over to the really big issue:
Have you done anything at all?
 
Exercise question? This is not for school dude...it's june, school is over. I'm working out of a book called Electricity and Magnetism by Purcell, by myself, and have gotten stuck on this question. Thank you so much for being helpful.
 
ffdbzathf said:
Exercise question? This is not for school dude...it's june, school is over. I'm working out of a book called Electricity and Magnetism by Purcell, by myself, and have gotten stuck on this question. Thank you so much for being helpful.

The forum rules require you to show your work (or thoughts/ideas) before you get help.

Also, if you drop the sarcasm, people might be more tempted to help :smile:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top