How Do You Calculate the Power Output of a Motor on an Inclined Ramp?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DoJang
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the power output of a motor on a 30-degree incline ramp with a 100kg object and a friction coefficient of 0.5, the net force acting on the object must be determined, factoring in gravitational and frictional forces. The motor accelerates the object at 0.22 m/s², leading to a calculated average power output of approximately 103.10 Watts based on an assumed time of 1 second. However, this assumption is contentious, as the power output varies with time due to the object's acceleration. Additionally, discussions on related topics, such as the work done by an elevator moving at constant velocity and the concept of net work, highlight that no net work is done when there is no acceleration, despite changes in potential energy. Overall, the problem emphasizes the need for precise information to accurately calculate power output in dynamic scenarios.
DoJang
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
:( Please help! Work,power and energy question

Homework Statement


There is a 100kg object on a 30-degree incline ramp.
The mew of friction is 0.5.
There is a motor on top of the ramp, which accelerates the object at .22 m/s^2 by a rope.
Find the power output of the motor.


Homework Equations


d=(vit)+(.5)(a)(t)^2
W=Fd
F=ma
P=w/t, E/s


The Attempt at a Solution


I think I'm supposed to use Ek+Ep+TE=0,
but how am I supposed to find the power without knowing the time?
So, I've tried this method:

P=J/s
J(work)= Fxd
So I thought maybe I'll use t=1:

vi=0
vf=x
a= 0.22
d=?
t=1

d=vit+(.5)(a)(t)^2
d=(.5)(.22)(1)
d=.11m

Fnet=ma
Fa-Ff=ma
Fa-(100kg)(9.81)(cos30)(.5[mew])-(100kg)(9.81)(sin30)=(100)(.22)
Fa-424.79-490.5=22
Fa=937.29N

W=Fd
W=(937.29)(.11)
W=103.10J

P=J/s
P=103.10Watts

So here's the one approach I had,
------------------
Here is the second

Ek+Ep+TE=0
(.5)(m)(vf^2-vi^2) + mgh + (Ff)d=0

To find Vf,
Vi=0
Vf=?
a=0.22
d=x
t=1s

a=(Vf-Vi)/t
.22=Vf/1
Vf=.22 m/s

plugging it back in,
(.5)(100kg)(0.0484) + (100)(9.81)(h) + (100)(9.81)(cos30)(0.5[mew])d=0

To find d,
Vi=0
Vf=x
a=.22
d=?
t=1s

d=vit+(.5)(a)(t^2)
done above,
d=0.11m

(.5)(100kg)(0.0484) + (100)(9.81)(h) + (100)(9.81)(cos30)(0.5)(0.11) = 0
2.42 + 981h + 46.73 = 0
h=.05m

Then plug the height of .05m,

to get 98.30J/s?
--------------


Another question:

If there is an elevator moving downwards to the ground at a constant velocity,
Is the work done 0J? Is the net work between Ft and Fg the same? How should I approach this question? I know there is NOT an acceleration. W=Fd, W=mad, so no work?
Although there is a ΔEnergy?

Another question:

Momentum question,
Is the "internal work" done by an explosion equal to the combined kinetic energy of the particles? Or is it 0J? How can i visualize internal work in a bomb-like scenario?


Thank you very much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


1) Normally...

Energy = force * distance
so
Power = force * velocity

However in this case the object is accelerating so the velocity and power can't be a constant value. It will be a function of time.

I'd draw the free body diagram and calculate all the forces acting down the slope. Then multiply by the equation for the velocity V(t)=at.

2) No.

A stationary elevator is subject to 1g.
An elevator accelerating upwards at 9.8m/s/s relative to the building is subject to 2g. (One due to gravity and one due to it's motion).
An elevator descending at a constant velocity is subject to 1g
An elevator accelerating downwards at 9.8m/s/s is subject to zero g.

So although not accelerating it is being accelerated. There is a force.
 


The first question is missing information, so it cannot be solved. On the assumption of the one second duration, your first approach yields the average power delivered by the motor. Your second approach to this problem is muddled..you left out the work done by the rope for one thing.

Regarding the elevator problem, the term net work refers to the total work done by all forces acting on the elevator. No acceleration implies no net force and no net work. That implies that the work done by gravity and the work done by the cable have the same magnitude but of opposite signs.
 


CWatters said:
1) Normally...

Energy = force * distance
so
Power = force * velocity

However in this case the object is accelerating so the velocity and power can't be a constant value. It will be a function of time.

I'd draw the free body diagram and calculate all the forces acting down the slope. Then multiply by the equation for the velocity V(t)=at.

2) No.

A stationary elevator is subject to 1g.
An elevator accelerating upwards at 9.8m/s/s relative to the building is subject to 2g. (One due to gravity and one due to it's motion).
An elevator descending at a constant velocity is subject to 1g
An elevator accelerating downwards at 9.8m/s/s is subject to zero g.

So although not accelerating it is being accelerated. There is a force.

1)

E = fd,
P = fv,

So I guess I should just use 1s here as well to find Vf?

Vi=0
Vf=?
a=0.22
d=x
t=1

a=(Vf-Vi)/t
0.22=(Vf)/1
Vf=0.22m/s

To find F,
Fgx= (100kg)(9.81)(sin30)
Fgx= 490.5N

Ff= (100kg)(9.81)(cos30)(0.5[mew])
Ff= 424.79N

Fa-Ff-Fgx=ma
Fa-424.79-490.5=(100)(0.22)
Fa-915.29=22
Fa=937.29N

P=fv,
P=(937.29N)(0.22m/s)
P=206.2 Watts?

2) The question about the elevator is a very basic level physics question, doesn't touch G-forces. It's high school physics, but the one of the higher-level questions.

PhanthomJay said:
The first question is missing information, so it cannot be solved. On the assumption of the one second duration, your first approach yields the average power delivered by the motor. Your second approach to this problem is muddled..you left out the work done by the rope for one thing.

Regarding the elevator problem, the term net work refers to the total work done by all forces acting on the elevator. No acceleration implies no net force and no net work. That implies that the work done by gravity and the work done by the cable have the same magnitude but of opposite signs.

The first question is not missing any information, I was thinking how I can solve for the power without knowing the time. It's one of those higher-level questions for the elementary physics problems. What is your opinion on the P=fv approach I took instead of the first approach I had?

Thank you for clearing up the elevator problem. Even though there is a ΔEp, there is no Net Work done? This is hard for me to understand.

Thank you.
 


DoJang:
You say there is no missing information, but yet, you had to make an assumption that t = 1 second to find the power. Suppose you assumed t = 10 seconds; then you would find v = 2.2 m/s, and average power would be 10 times higher than before (1030 watts) and instantaneous power F(v) would be 2060 watts, also ten times higher. Your assumption is no better than mine; you need more info. BTW, work/time is average power; instantaneous power is F(v). The two are equal only when speed is constant , no acceleration.
Edit: I fogot to addres your question
Thank you for clearing up the elevator problem. Even though there is a ΔEp, there is no Net Work done? This is hard for me to understand.
Gravitational potential energy changes are due to the work done by gravity only, a conservative force. There is no potential energy function associated with non conservative forces like rope tensions. When gravity does work, there will be a gravitational potential energy change, regardless of whether work done by other forces results in no net work being done.
 
Last edited:


So I guess I should just use 1s here as well to find Vf?

No. That would just give you the power required after t=1s at which point it is some arbitrary distance up the ramp. The velocity is changing so the power is increasing constantly. It will be consuming more power after t=2s.

As others have said, there is something missing from the problem OR you will have to give the power as a function of time.

Is the height of the ramp known? If so you could work out the velocity at the top which would give you the maximium power needed.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top