How Do You Calculate the Probability Density p(E) for an Ideal Gas?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ehrenfest
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gas Ideal gas
ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


The following is a probability density distribution for an ideal gas:
p(v_x,v_y,v_z) = (2 \pi \sigma ^2)^{-3/2} \exp\left({\frac{v_x^2 +v_y^2+v_z^2}{2 \sigma^2}}\right)

E = 0.5 m |\vec{v}|^2

Find p(E).

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I want to just plug in what E but that gives the wrong answer and I cannot figure out why.
p(E) = (2 \pi \sigma ^2)^{-3/2} \exp\left({\frac{E}{m \sigma^2}}\right)
Why is that wrong? It makes no sense, but I just plugged in what E was! This is really bothering me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ehrenfest said:

Homework Statement


The following is a probability density distribution for an ideal gas:
p(v_x,v_y,v_z) = (2 \pi \sigma ^2)^{-3/2} \exp\left({\frac{v_x^2 +v_y^2+v_z^2}{2 \sigma^2}}\right)

E = 0.5 m |\vec{v}|^2

Find p(E).

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I want to just plug in what E but that gives the wrong answer and I cannot figure out why.
p(E) = (2 \pi \sigma ^2)^{-3/2} \exp\left({\frac{E}{m \sigma^2}}\right)
Why is that wrong? It makes no sense, but I just plugged in what E was! This is really bothering me.


What is the correct answer? It's a probability *density* so there is also a factor dv_x dv_y dv_z that must be multiplied to get a probability. If you want the probability density in terms of the energy you wil have to relate the above factors to the infinitesimal dE

EDIT: it's a density in speed so the factor to convert is probably dv
 
Interesting. BTW, is it generally true that if y=y(x) and x=x(z), then y=y(x(z))? That is, you can write y as a function of z just by plugging in x as a function of z. That rule seems to fail here. But in general, when is it true?
 
Last edited:
ehrenfest said:
Interesting. BTW, is it generally true that if y=y(x) and x=x(z), then y=y(x(z))? That is, you can right y as a function of z just by plugging in x as a function of z. That rule seems to fail here. But in general, when is it true?

It is true in general, yes.

The problem here is that what you are looking for is *not* simply y(x(z))!

what you are looking for is the probability density in energy so the probability of measuring an energy between E and E+dE.. If you just plug in v in terms of energy, you are still giving the probability density in *speed*, so you are giving th eprobability of measuring the speed between v and v+dv. This is not what you are asked to find!
 
So, back to the original problem. p(v_x, v_y, v_z)dv_x dv_y dv_z[/tex] gives the probability of finding the particle&#039;s velocity in the box with side lengths dv_x, dv_y, dv_z with the one corner at (v_x, v_y, v_z).<br /> <br /> And I want to find p(E) such that p(E)dE[/tex] gives the probability of finding the particle&amp;#039;s energy between E and E+dE. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; We know that dE = 1/2m(2v_x dv_x + 2v_y dv_y+2v_z dv_z), but I still don&amp;#039;t really know how to proceed. Do express each of dv_x dv_y dv_z as a function of dE somehow?&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; You said something about just using dv, but I am not sure what you meant. Can you elaborate?
 
ehrenfest said:
So, back to the original problem. p(v_x, v_y, v_z)dv_x dv_y dv_z[/tex] gives the probability of finding the particle&#039;s velocity in the box with side lengths dv_x, dv_y, dv_z with the one corner at (v_x, v_y, v_z).<br /> <br /> And I want to find p(E) such that p(E)dE[/tex] gives the probability of finding the particle&amp;#039;s energy between E and E+dE. &lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; We know that dE = 1/2m(2v_x dv_x + 2v_y dv_y+2v_z dv_z), but I still don&amp;#039;t really know how to proceed. Do express each of dv_x dv_y dv_z as a function of dE somehow?&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; You said something about just using dv, but I am not sure what you meant. Can you elaborate?
&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; You can&amp;#039;t directly get from the distribution in v_x, v_y an dv_z to the density in Energy since there is more information in the first than in the second (since E depends only on v^2). So you need to find the probability density in the speed first. So you integrate over all directions using dv_x dv_y dv_z = v^2 dv d\Omega. But the result of the angular integral is simply 4 \pi v^2 dv times the probability density in v_x, v_y and v_z so&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; \rho(v) dv = 4 \pi \rho(v_x,v_y,v_z) v^2 dv&lt;br /&gt; where it is understood that in the sceon term you rewrite everything in terms of the speed v.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top