How Do You Calculate the Solubility of AgCl in an HCl Solution with pH 2.30?

  • Thread starter Thread starter physicsperson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Product Solubility
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the solubility of AgCl in an HCl solution with a pH of 2.30, first determine the concentration of HCl, which is approximately 0.005 M. Using the Ksp of AgCl (1.7 x 10^-10), the concentration of Cl- from HCl can be used to find the Ag+ concentration. The solubility product expression allows for solving the molar solubility of AgCl, which is equivalent to the Ag+ concentration. Finally, convert the molar solubility to grams per liter to obtain the final solubility value.
physicsperson
Messages
20
Reaction score
1
[SOLVED] equilibirum and solubility product

I need some help with this question, if there are any chemistry whizzes around id really appreciate it:

Calculate the solubility of AgCl (in grams of AgCl/ L of solution) in an HCl solution having pH of 2.30. Ksp of silver chloride = 1.7 x 10^-10.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
so far all i can tell is that from the ph u get the concentration of HCL, then...im lost
 
ok i got some help, apparently u use the cl concentration from hcl and the ksp and solve for Ag conc. which should be same as the molar solubility for in mol/l of AgCl then just convert. thanks for any help or good intentions.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top