How Do You Calculate the Specific Heat Capacity of a Cupronickel Alloy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Eleeist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Alloy
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the specific heat capacity (SHC) of a Cupronickel alloy, the SHC values of its components, copper and nickel, are essential. The SHC of copper is 0.39 kJ/kg K, while nickel's is 0.54 kJ/kg K. Assuming a composition of 75% copper and 25% nickel, the theoretical SHC can be determined using a weighted average based on these proportions. Additionally, the Heat of Mixing must be considered, as it can affect the SHC and varies with temperature. This approach allows for a comparison between experimental results and theoretical values.
Eleeist
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I have done an experiment in which I measured the specific heat capacity of a coin. I would like to compare the results to the actual value. I have found out that the coin is made of Cupronickel alloy (for simplicity let's assume it's just 75% copper and 25% nickel).

SHC of copper: 0.39 kJ/kg K
SHC of nickel: 0.54 kJ/kg K

Knowing the SHC values of the two elements (copper and nickel) how would I go about calculating the theoretical value of the SHC of the Cupronickel alloy, so that I can compare it to my experiment's results?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Eleeist said:

Homework Statement



I have done an experiment in which I measured the specific heat capacity of a coin. I would like to compare the results to the actual value. I have found out that the coin is made of Cupronickel alloy (for simplicity let's assume it's just 75% copper and 25% nickel).

SHC of copper: 0.39 kJ/kg K
SHC of nickel: 0.54 kJ/kg K

Knowing the SHC values of the two elements (copper and nickel) how would I go about calculating the theoretical value of the SHC of the Cupronickel alloy, so that I can compare it to my experiment's results?

To do this, you need to know the Heat of Mixing, and how it varies with temperature.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
239
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Back
Top