How Do You Calculate the Speed of a Boat Relative to Water?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the speed of a boat relative to water, consider the boat's round trip distance of 10.2 km (5.1 km each way) and the stream's flow rate of 3.4 km/hr. The total time for the trip is 1.5 hours, which can be divided into upstream and downstream segments. Using the equation distance = speed × time, set up two equations for the upstream and downstream speeds, factoring in the current's effect on the boat's speed. This approach eliminates the need for right triangle calculations, simplifying the problem to a straightforward application of speed and time relationships.
Elbobo
Messages
145
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two boat landings are 5.1 km apart on the
same bank of a streamthat flows at 3.4 km/hr.
A motorboat makes the round trip between
the two landings in 1.5 hr.
What is the speed of the boat relative to
the water? Answer in units of km/hr.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to get the velocity of the water relative to the shore plus the velocity of the boat relative to shore to equal the velocity of the boat relative to the water.

That would give a right triangle with Vws and Vbs as the legs, and Vbw (what I'm trying to find) as the hypotenuse.

So I get sqrt ( (5.1 / 0.75)^2 + 3.4^2), which is 7.60 and wrong.

Please help me, I don't understand what I am doing wrong...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Elbobo said:
I tried to get the velocity of the water relative to the shore plus the velocity of the boat relative to shore to equal the velocity of the boat relative to the water.
velocity(boat/shore) = velocity(boat/water) + velocity(water/shore)

There's no need for any right triangles, since all velocities are in the same (or opposite) direction.

Hint: Use distance = speed*time
Set up that equation for when the boat's going upstream and for when its going downstream.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Back
Top