How Do You Calculate the Work Done by Friction on a Skier?

  • Thread starter Thread starter neoncrazy101
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Work
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the work done by friction on a skier coasting up a hill, the skier's mass, initial and final speeds, and the hill's angle are essential. The initial and final energy equations must be correctly set up, considering potential energy changes due to height. A common mistake is misapplying the gravitational constant, where it should be treated as positive when calculating potential energy. The correct work done by friction is found to be -2100J, and the magnitude of the kinetic frictional force is determined to be 1030N. Properly understanding the signs in energy equations is crucial for accurate results.
neoncrazy101
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 71.2-kg skier coasts up a snow-covered hill that makes an angle of 31.4 ° with the horizontal. The initial speed of the skier is 9.96 m/s. After coasting a distance of 2.04 m up the slope, the speed of the skier is 4.41 m/s. (a) Find the work done by the kinetic frictional force that acts on the skis. (b) What is the magnitude of the kinetic frictional force?


Homework Equations


Ef= Eo (aka 1/2mvf^2 + mghf = 1/2mvo^2 + mgho


The Attempt at a Solution


Final: 1/2(71.2)(4.41)2+71.2(-9.8)(1.74) = -521 (H=2.04cos(31.4), right?)
Initial: 1/2(71.2)(9.96)2+71(-9.8)(0) = 3531

The answer our phyrics program gives for this problem is A: -2100J and for B: 1030N. But I cannot figure this problem out. What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The angle is with the horizontal, so the height should be 2.04sin(31.4)
 
Ok, that was one mistake but I must of done something else, I still get the wrong answer.

Final: 1/2(71.2)(4.41)2+(71.2)(-9.8)(1.06) = -47.27324
Initial: 1/2(71.2)(9.96)2+(71.2)(-9.8)(0) = 3531.57696

Ef - Eo = -3578.85284

The answer is supposed to be -2100J. Must be something else that I am doing wrong.
 
Your sign on g is wrong. The way you have it, the potential energy is lower when you are higher up.
 
Oh. that's works. I totally thought that it was supposed to be -9.8. thanks. Now I'm getting -2100.
 
For energy, g is almost always positive. In fact, it's best to leave g positive and determine the sign based on the coordinate system in use.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top