How Do You Calculate Wave Parameters for a Transverse Sinusoidal Wave?

AI Thread Summary
A transverse sinusoidal wave is described with a speed of 80 m/s, a maximum displacement of 4.2 cm, and a maximum transverse speed of 18 m/s. The displacement at t = 0 and x = 0 indicates the particle is at maximum displacement and not moving. The user initially miscalculated the frequency and wavelength, leading to an implausibly large wavelength of 21827 m. After addressing unit conversions and recalculating, they realized an error in their formula application. The discussion emphasizes the importance of consistent units and careful formula usage in wave parameter calculations.
Qudos
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A transverse sinusoidal wave is moving along a string in the positive direction of an x-axis with a speed of 80 m/s. At t = 0, the string particle at x = 0 has a transverse displacement of 4.2 cm from its equilibrium position and is not moving. The maximum transverse speed of the string particle at x = 0 is 18 m/s.
It asks to solve for f,λ,y_{m},k,ω, and \phi in the wave formula


Homework Equations



y(x, t) = y_{m} sin(kx ± ωt + \phi)


The Attempt at a Solution


Since it says at t and x = 0 the displacement is 4.2cm and stopped moving i assumed that meant that it had reached its max displacement. I then used u_m=ωy_m
for the max transverse speed and solved for ω, which i put into the formula
f=\frac{ω}{2\pi} which gave me 0.00367s^-1, and solving for wavelength using λ=\frac{v}{f} gave me 21827m which doesn't seem right, I'm pretty sure I'm doing something wrong, any help would be appreciated.

thanks

Oh and btw i converted all the cm to m before calculating.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You wrote,

u_m=ωy_m (why can't I copy and paste your formulas intact? Oh well)

Did you mix units, the displacement was given in cm and the velocity in m/s ? We want everything in cm or m.
 
Yes i converted 4.2cm to 0.042m, then divided 18m/s by 0.042m to get a very large ω value of 428.6
 
Ok, i calculated again and i think i switched the denominator with the numerator in something. Seems to be more reasonable now.
Thanks
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Back
Top