How Do You Calculate Work and Moment in Vector Problems?

AI Thread Summary
To calculate work and moment in vector problems, the work done by force A on object C can be found using the dot product of the force vector and the displacement vector. The confusion arises from the definition of work, which is the force acting in the direction of motion. For the moment calculations, the cross product formula M = rxF is applicable, but the user struggles with part (e) due to the involvement of multiple vectors A, B, and C. Clarification is sought on how to effectively apply the moment calculation for this scenario. Understanding the application of vector operations is essential for solving these types of physics problems.
xcgirl
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A = 2i - 3j + 3k
B = 4i +2j + k
C = i + 2j - 2k

a) Find the work done by force A to move an object C
b)Find the work done by the forces A and B acting together that moves an object C
c)Suppose point O is defined at the tail of C. Find the moment of force A applied at the head of C about O
d)Suppose point O is defined at the tail of B. Find the moment of force A applied at the head of B about O
e)Suppose point O is defined at the head of B. Find the moment of force A applied at the head of C about O


Homework Equations



W = Fdcos(theta)
|M| = d|F|
M = rxF

The Attempt at a Solution



I am pretty sure that I can do the moment problems but I am confused about finding the work since I've always learned that work is force multiplied by distance. In my book it said that work is force that acts in the same direction as the motion of a body, so I thought I would take the dot product.
I did A dot C and got 2i - 6J -3k

For the moment problems c and d I used M = rxF to get the answer. I think this is the right way to do it, but I don't know how to apply this method to part (e) because it involves A, B, and C

Can you tell me if any of this is the right thinking?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
xcgirl said:
For the moment problems c and d I used M = rxF to get the answer. I think this is the right way to do it, but I don't know how to apply this method to part (e) because it involves A, B, and C

Why do you think you can't apply "rxF" to (e)?
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top