How Do You Convert 2-Axis Rotation to 3-Axis Lift for a Disc?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dav_i
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lift Rotation
dav_i
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi there,
In my experiment I have a disc which needs to be pitched and rolled about it's centre. The disk is mounted by three verticle "pistons" one every 120degrees. I need to convert a tilt in the x-direction \theta_x and a tilt in the y-direction \theta_y to how much each piston should be raised and lowered by. An additional constraint is that the centre of the disc must stay at the same height.
I've been bashing my head against a wall with this for what seems like forever and any help will be appreciated...

Homework Equations


We name the positioners A, B and C at height z_{a,b,c} and the angle from origin O to A is \alpha O to B as \beta and O to C \gamma.
The direction O to A is at an angle of \Omega to the x-axis.
The length of O to A is r.

The Attempt at a Solution


I figured out that
\alpha = \theta_x\cos\Omega + \frac{\sqrt{3}}{3}\sin\Omega+ \theta_y\frac{\sqrt{3}}{3}\cos\Omega-\theta_y\sin\Omega
and
\beta = \theta_x 2 \frac{\sqrt{3}}{3} \sin \Omega + \theta_y 2 \frac{\sqrt{3}}{3} \cos\Omega
From here I get stuck: I've tried many things but I know they're wrong (as in my experiment it doesn't work properly!)
Any help please, thanks in advance
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Solution found!
Measure the average height of the three points.
Use trig to move z_a and z_b.
Remeasure average height.
Move z_a, z_b and z_c all the difference between the two.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top