How Do You Convert and Round Measurements to SI Units with Significant Figures?

AI Thread Summary
To express measurements in SI units with significant figures, both Joules (J) and kilojoules (kJ) are acceptable, with the base unit being Joules. When converting to kJ, the value should be rounded appropriately; for example, 589883.4263 J converts to 590 kJ when rounded to three significant figures. The correct notation for kilojoules is "kJ," not "KJ," as case sensitivity matters in unit prefixes. For a value like 1674.324432 J, it should be expressed as 1670 J or 1.67 kJ, depending on the required significant figures. Understanding these conventions is crucial for accurate scientific communication.
jybe
Messages
41
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



If I am asked to give my answer in acceptable SI units and to 3 significant figures, how would I express my answer?

Homework Equations



Answer: 589883.4263 J

The Attempt at a Solution



My instinct would be to put this in KJ, but I don't know if that's an "acceptable SI unit". I can't find anything about it online. Does it have to stay in J?

If KJ I would write it as 590 KJ, right?

and if I had something like 1674.324432 J, would I express it as 1670 J or 1.67 KJ? I'm really confused.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Both J and kJ are perfectly acceptable SI units. The base unit is the Joule, of course, in case that's what they are looking for.
 
Note that its kJ, not KJ. Case is important in many prefixes.
 
Orodruin said:
Note that its kJ, not KJ. Case is important in many prefixes.

Oh wow...I actually think that was the problem. I used J this time and got it right but thanks for that heads up
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top