How Do You Correctly Integrate the Delta Function in This Equation?

AI Thread Summary
The integral of the function involving the delta function, evaluated from -3 to 5, leads to confusion regarding the professor's solution of \frac{1}{2} e^{-10} sin(2). The delta function, delta(t-5), implies that the integral should only consider the value at t=5, but the limits of integration raise questions about whether half of the delta spike is being integrated. Some participants argue that the integral is technically undefined due to the limits not encompassing the entire delta function spike. The discussion highlights the complexities of integrating delta functions and the differing interpretations that can arise in mathematical physics. Ultimately, the consensus leans toward the solution being contestable or undefined.
EugP
Messages
104
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Evaluate:

\int_{-3}^{5} e^{-2t} sin(t-3) \delta(t-5) dt


Homework Equations



\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} f(t) \delta(at-t_0) dt = \frac{1}{|a|}f(\frac{t_0}{a})

The Attempt at a Solution



e^{-2(5)} sin (5-3) = e^{-10} sin (2)

The solution given by the professor was:

\frac{1}{2} e^{-10} sin (2)

I don't understand where he got the \frac{1}{2} from.

If anyone could help me it would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's a bit cheeky, and technically your professor's answer is contestable. Because your integration limits are only up to 5, and the delta function is delta(t-5), you've only integrated "half" of the delta spike. Now, if that sounds absurd -- "how the hell can you only integrate half of an infinitesimally thin spike?!" -- just remember that the delta function itself is not really very sensible as a function anyway. Personally, I treat that sort of integral as badly defined; more specifically, since I'm a physicist, I arrange my physics so that the maths never requires me to contemplate these soul-searching issues :wink:
 
Hm, interesting... I never knew that you integrate only half the delta spike.
 
user101 said:
Hm, interesting... I never knew that you integrate only half the delta spike.

You shouldn't. As genneth was pointing out, there are perfectly fine representations of the delta function in which you can get a completely different answer. The correct answer is 'undefined', with all due respect to the composer of the solutions.
 
Back
Top