How do you derive this formula?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Trickster_00
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derive Formula
AI Thread Summary
The formula for the Conservation of Mechanical Energy states that the sum of initial kinetic and potential energy equals the sum of final kinetic and potential energy. This principle is often considered an axiom rather than something that can be derived. When external forces, such as friction, are involved, the work done by these forces alters the total energy of the system without destroying it. The work-energy principle asserts that the work done on a system equals the total change in energy, which can include potential energy, kinetic energy, and other forms. Understanding these concepts is essential for analyzing energy transformations in physical systems.
Trickster_00
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
How do we come to the formula for Conservation of Mechanical Energy?
[Initial Kinetic Energy + Initial Potential Energy = Final Kinetic Energy + Final Potential Energy]

It's not a part of our syllabus, but I'm just curious how to derive that formula.

Also, could you please clarify to me what's the formula for work-energy principle?

My book says it's [Work done = Change in Kinetic Energy]... but what if it involves external forces (e.g., friction) and change in potential energy? I'd appreciate it too if you break down the formula for me. Much appreciated. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can't really derive conservation of energy it's sort of like what a mathematician would call an axiom.

There are many ways however in which you can see conservation of energy come into play but they all require that it is taken to be true.
 
Feldoh is absolutely right.

When you have work done by an external force, it will either take away or add to the total energy of the system. The energy is not destroyed, just moved from one system to another.

For Friction ---> Initial PE + Initial KE = Final PE + Final KE + Work done by Friction.

M
 
Just to clarify, the work energy principal should state that work done on a system is equal to the total energy change of the system. This means work can increase PE, KE, spring PE, internal energy, etc, of the system.
For example, raising an object slowly and coming to rest has no change on KE, but requires work to increase the PE. Compressing a spring has no effect on KE, but still requires work to increase the spring energy. Even the work done by friction is never lost, it raises the internal energy of the objects in contact.

M
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top