How do you find the derivatives of a power series?

stupidmonkey
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://imgur.com/FJhgN
Give this power series J(x) (leftmost in the picture), find the first and second derivative.

Homework Equations


You take the derivative of a power series term by term.


The Attempt at a Solution


I don't understand how to get the J''(x) in the image, which is the solution that was given. I thought that when you take the derivative of J'(x) you start from n=1 in J'(x), but then start from n=2 in J''(x). I can get the term inside the summation though.
This question is part of a problem that asks you to prove (x^2)J(x)+xJ(x)+(x^2)J(x)=0 and the proof will only work if J''(x) starts from n=1 so I don't think the answer is a typo.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks like it's just re-indexing the series. Consider the following:
\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} x^n
and
\sum_{n=2}^{\infty} x^{n-1}

These are exactly the same, we just changed where the dummy variable starts, and the terms in the series had to shift to compensate
 
Hmmm but I thought when you took the derivative of
Ʃ(n=1 to infinity) ((-1)^n)(x^(2n-1))(2n)/((2^(2n))(((m+1)!)^2) you get

Ʃ(n=2 to infinity) ((-1)^n)(x^(2n-2))(2n)(2n-1)/((2^(2n))((n!)^2))

Then if you change the index to n=1 you get:

Ʃ(n=1 to infinity) (((-1)^(n+1)))(2(n+1)(2n+1)(x^(2n))/((2^(2m+2)((m+1)!)^2)
which is different...
Sorry for the ugly complicated symbols, I don't know how to make it look more clean...
Btw how do you make such a large sigma symbol?
 
stupidmonkey said:
Sorry for the ugly complicated symbols, I don't know how to make it look more clean...
Btw how do you make such a large sigma symbol?

Sorry for not addressing the problem, but I'm a bit rusty with power series.

In the "Reply to Thread" window (the "advanced" one with formatting toolbar), on the far right of the toolbar is the sigma symbol. Clicking that will open a sort of index of symbols/formatting/etc. in LaTeX.

You can search for LaTeX commands through Google as well. I'm sure there's also a thread about this somewhere. . .
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=8997
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top