How Do You Find the Electric Field at the Origin From a Semi-Ring of Charge?

seang
Messages
184
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


How do I find the electric field from a semi-ring of charge at the center of the would-be circle? Does that make sense? Or another way: If the semi-circle of charge is centered at the origin, what is the electric field at the origin? I hope you know what I mean now.

the total charge of the ring is Q, the radius is R.

Oh yeah, the semi circle is in the left hand plane

Homework Equations


<br /> E = k\int_{}^{l}\frac{(r-r&#039;)\rho _l(r&#039;)}{|r-r&#039;|^3} dl&#039;<br /> <br />

The Attempt at a Solution



<br /> E = k\int_{\pi/2}^{-\pi/2}\frac{(-r&#039;)\rho _l(r&#039;)}{|-r&#039;|^3} d\theta<br />

Is converting to cylindrical coordinates the right move? Is this even the equation I should be using? What should I use as the charge density?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Try applying Gauss's Theorem. Assume a gaussian surface enclosing the ring and \int E.ds=\frac{q}{\epsilon}
 
Gauss won't work here because there is not full circular symmetry
There is enough symmetry to see the direction of the E field.
Just put cos\theta into the numerator of your integral.
rho is really a linear density lambda=Q/2pi R.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top