How Do You Find The Exact Value Of Square Root of 3, 5, 7, 11?

AI Thread Summary
Finding the exact values of square roots for numbers like 3, 5, 7, and 11 reveals that these roots are irrational and cannot be expressed as terminating or repeating decimals. The best representation for these square roots remains in their radical form, such as √2, √3, √5, and so on. All integers that are not perfect squares share this characteristic, making their square roots also irrational. While decimal approximations exist, an alternative representation is through infinite continued fractions, which provide a structured pattern for expressing these values. Ultimately, the exact values of these square roots can only be represented in their radical forms.
mymachine
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Is there any method to find the exact value of the square root of 3,5,7,11,13,14,15,17,18, etc.?

Thank you
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Arithmetic algorithms can approximate these square roots, but because they are all irrational, the decimal representations are non-repeating and non-terminating.
 
The exact values of the square root of 2, 3, 5 ,7, 11, etc are \sqrt{2}, \sqrt{3}, \sqrt{5}, \sqrt{7}, \sqrt{11}. That's the best you can do. As SteamKing said, all of those, and, in fact, the square root of any integer that is not a "perfect square", are irrational- they cannot be written as a terminating decimal, they cannot be written as a repeating decimal like "0.14141414...", and cannot be written as a fraction (integer over integer).

(I added "2" to the beginning of your list. I am surprized you did not have it.)
 
Might as well add 6, 8, 10, and so on to the list, since none of these is a perfect square, and consequently does not have a square root that is rational.
 
If instead of a infinite decimal expansion you would accept some other infinite expression then you can express the square root of 2 as an infinite continued fraction.
 
lavinia said:
If instead of a infinite decimal expansion you would accept some other infinite expression then you can express the square root of 2 as an infinite continued fraction.

The infinite fraction representation is a really nice one because it exhibits a lot of regularity. In the decimal expansion of ##\sqrt{2}##, there is no way to know which decimal comes next. But the infinite fraction is very straightforward and exhibits a nice pattern.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top