How Do You Find the Laplace Inverse of \( \frac{40}{(s^2+4s+5)^2} \)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gethelpelectr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse Laplace
gethelpelectr
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



laplace inverse of (40/(s^2+4s+5)^2)?

Homework Equations



I completed the square in the denominator to get 40/((s+2)^2+1)^2
I know that I will get cosines and sines from the shape of it in the laplace inverse; however I'm stuck.


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
I get the follwing result:
20e^{-2t}(\sin(t)-t\cos(t))
But couldn't find any formula, so i did it with Maple 15
 
gethelpelectr said:

Homework Statement



laplace inverse of (40/(s^2+4s+5)^2)?

Homework Equations



I completed the square in the denominator to get 40/((s+2)^2+1)^2
I know that I will get cosines and sines from the shape of it in the laplace inverse; however I'm stuck.


The Attempt at a Solution


It will be a lot easier if you first factor the expression p = s^2 + 4s + 5, then convert your expression 1/p^2 to partial fractions.

RGV
 
dikmikkel This answer is correct; however I don't know how to get there.
Ray Vickson, we are not used to getting complex numbers.
 
gethelpelectr said:
dikmikkel This answer is correct; however I don't know how to get there.
Ray Vickson, we are not used to getting complex numbers.

You should get used to it; they are part of a standard toolkit and are used routinely in Physics, Engineering and Applied Math. However, if you don't want to use complex quantities you can use the convolution theorem instead: first get the inverse Laplace transform of 1/(s^2 + 4s + 5), then find that of 1/(s^2 + 4s + 5)^2 by convolution.

RGV
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top