Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the proper order of ligands in the naming of the complex ion triammineaquadihydroxochromium(III) chloride. Participants explore the rules for ligand arrangement, considering factors such as charge and alphabetical order.
Discussion Character
- Homework-related
- Debate/contested
- Technical explanation
Main Points Raised
- One participant states that the transition metal should be listed first, followed by the ligands, but is uncertain about the order of the neutral ligands (NH3 and H2O) compared to the charged ligand (OH).
- Another participant proposes that neutral ligands should precede charged ligands and suggests that neutral ligands should be organized alphabetically by their chemical symbols, leading to the formula [CrH2O(NH3)3(OH)2]Cl.
- A third participant expresses uncertainty about the correct naming conventions and references IUPAC guidelines, specifically mentioning the "Red book" as a potential authoritative source.
- A fourth participant asserts that the correct order should place the transition metal first, followed by anionic ligands, and then neutral ligands alphabetically, concluding with the formula [Cr(OH)2(H2O)(NH3)3]Cl.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct order of ligands, with multiple competing views presented regarding the arrangement of neutral and charged ligands.
Contextual Notes
Participants highlight the need for clarity on IUPAC naming rules, indicating that the discussion may be limited by varying interpretations of these guidelines.