How do you know what goes together to form a 4-vector?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Astrofiend
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    4-vector Form
Astrofiend
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
I've been studying relativity and standard model physics, and I don't understand how it is determined what 'things' go together to form a 4-vector. For example, there is the familiar energy momentum 4-vector, the charge-current density four vector, the phi-A (scalar/vector potential) 4-vector from electromagnetism, the frequency-wavevector four vector from special relativity, and so on and so forth.

Apart from the fact that these quantities evidently DO transform as four-vectors, is there some first principle argument that shows what quantities will go together to transform as a four-vector, like say in quantum mechanics where non-commuting operators indicate the existence of an uncertainty relation between quantities? Like how would you know that charge density and current density would form components of a 4vector and transform like one?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Astrofiend! :smile:

If it turns up in a covariant equation, it has to be a spinor or a 4-vector or …

If it's one-dimensional, it'll be a 4-vector. :wink:

(eg current has dimension one, so it'll be part of a 4-vector, and so will its density)
 
Cheers mate - appreciate the response! I'll have to go away and think it over a bit...
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top