How do you measure numerically central charge of the system ?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on measuring the central charge in a statistical system undergoing Monte-Carlo simulations, particularly at a conformal point exhibiting scale invariance. While the central charge is linked to free energy and the stress-energy tensor, these are not directly observable in Monte-Carlo methods. Participants explore theoretical and experimental approaches, including the use of electroscopes for measuring electrostatic charge, emphasizing the importance of consistent measurement scales. Technical challenges in both theoretical suggestions and lab techniques are acknowledged. The conversation highlights the need for systematic methods to numerically assess the central charge in conformal field theories.
Murtuza Tipu
Messages
47
Reaction score
2
Let's say that you are doing some Monte-Carlo simulations of a statistical system on a lattice and you observe scale invariance, meaning that you are at a conformal point. Can you get a numerical appreciation of the central charge?

I know how the central charge is related on the free energy (on a cylinder for example) or to the stress-energy tensor but these are not direct observable in a Monte-Carlo.

Is there a systematic method for that? Has it already been done?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Measuring electrostatic charge

Well, theoretical suggestions are as many;
but lab techniques suggest for scaled electroscopes to do as such.
There also are technical issues

Measuring the q charge - contacting method
1) Sure one has to contact the "point" charge with the top head of the electroscope.
2) The scale has to agree with the physical systems of measurements, SI or else.

Measuring the V potential capabilities - induction method
1) Sure one has to keep the "point" charge at several distances with the top head of the electroscope.
2) The scale has to agree with the physical systems of measurements, SI or else.
 
alionalizoti said:
Well, theoretical suggestions are as many;
but lab techniques suggest for scaled electroscopes to do as such.
There also are technical issues

Measuring the q charge - contacting method
1) Sure one has to contact the "point" charge with the top head of the electroscope.
2) The scale has to agree with the physical systems of measurements, SI or else.

Measuring the V potential capabilities - induction method
1) Sure one has to keep the "point" charge at several distances with the top head of the electroscope.
2) The scale has to agree with the physical systems of measurements, SI or else.
Is you answer about measuring an electric charge? I'm interested in 'measuring' numerically the central charge which is a number characterizing a conformal field theory.
 
Measuring the charge

Of course, I mean measuring the electrostatic charge,
which sure be at the center of any net field or field net, whatever!
( any means theoretical or experimental )
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
4K
Back
Top