How Do You Model a Collision and Determine G-Force?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Aion96
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collision Model
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around modeling a collision and understanding g-force, which is described as an object's apparent weight. The participant attempts to calculate experienced g-forces during a collision, using formulas that separate horizontal and vertical components. They assume a mass of 80 kg for the person involved and derive equations for acceleration, impulse, and displacement. There is a clarification on the interpretation of signs in calculations, emphasizing that speed is always positive while displacement can be negative based on the chosen convention. The conversation highlights the importance of extending collision time to reduce injury, referencing design elements in vehicles and helmets that absorb kinetic energy.
Aion96
Messages
8
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
Suppose that a man runs into a wall and dies while experiencing 50 g for 0,002 seconds. How much force was exerted on him during impact, and how big was the impulse? How fast did he run, what was the stopping distance, contact time
Relevant Equations
Horizontal number of g¨'s = ##\frac{a_{x}}{g}## and the vertical number of g¨'s = ##\frac{F_{N}}{Fg}=\frac{F_{N}}{mg}##
My homework consists of trying to create a simple model for a collision. But I have trouble understanding a specific part of the assignment, namely what g-force is. I'm guessing that I'm allowed to make assumptions. But without understanding adequately the definition for g-force, I don't think I'll make any headway.

I've read that g-force is an object's apparent weight. I've found some formulas online that states that the experienced g-force can be separated into the horizontal and the vertical direction. That the horizontal number of g¨'s = ##\frac{a_{x}}{g}## and the vertical number of g¨'s = ##\frac{F_{N}}{Fg}=\frac{F_{N}}{mg}##. I'm guessing ##50 g## means the experienced apparent weight in the horizontal direction. And we have to assume a reasonable mass for the person. So I'll suppose the person has a mass of ##80 kg##. In either case, I'll proceed with the following reasoning
$$50=\frac{a_{x}}{g} \Rightarrow a_{x}=50g$$
By Newtons second law $$\Sigma F_{x}=ma_{x}=50mg$$
Since we are given ##\Delta t##, by the impulse law, it follows that
$$I=\Sigma F_{x}\Delta t =m\Delta v=\Delta p=ma_{x}\Delta t=50mg\Delta t$$
I'll assume that the person after the collision has zero momentum since the final velocity is zero. This simplifies ##\Delta p## into

$$\Delta p=p_{f}-p{i}=-p_{i}=-mv_{i}=50mg\Delta t \iff v_{i}=-50g\Delta t$$

Since we've already assumed that the final velocity is zero, this implies that the final kinetic energy is also zero. By the work-energy theorem we can calculate the displacement, ##d##, the person traveled before the collision. Hence

$$\Sigma F_{x} \cdot d=\Delta W_{k}=W_{k_{f}}-W_{k_{i}}=-W_{k_{i}}=-\frac{1}{2}mv_{i}^2\iff d=\frac{-m_{v_{i}}^2}{2\Sigma F_{x}}=-25g\Delta t^2$$
And the average speed is given by

$$v_{avg}=\frac{d}{\Delta t}=\frac{-25g\Delta t^2}{\Delta t}=-25g\Delta t$$

I'm moderately sure I'm wrong, but this was my attempt anyway. Any help would be appreciated!
P.S. Apologies for my grammar.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks correct.
As you got numbers you should plug them into the answers to get numerical answers, too.
 
  • Like
Likes Aion96
You may find some information on human tolerance to g-forces here:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/G-force#Human_tolerance

The body experiments a negative acceleration that is 50 times greater than the natural acceleration of gravity.
There is a peak force that is used to damage hard and soft tissue.

The solidness of the wall helps decrease the time of the collision, which is not good.
Trying to extend that time is the purpose of the pliable front sections of cars and the cushion material inside motorcycle helmets, which can deform and absorb a good portion of the kinetic energy.
 
Last edited:
mfb said:
Looks correct.
As you got numbers you should plug them into the answers to get numerical answers, too.
Yes. But isn't g positive? Then the initial velocity is negative. And I don't understand why the displacement has a negative value as well. Should I interpret this to mean that his body has deformed during the collision while the wall stayed intact?
 
The signs of the velocity and displacement depend on the arbitrary convention which direction is positive. The question doesn't ask for the velocity, the question asks how fast he was running - his speed. The speed is always positive. Similarly, it asks for the unsigned braking distance, not the displacement.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top