How do you parametrize the unit square in the complex plane?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the parametrization of the unit square in the complex plane, specifically focusing on how to represent its sides for potential applications such as line integrals.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore various methods for parametrizing the sides of the unit square, questioning the need and purpose behind different parametrizations. Some suggest treating each side of the square separately, while others provide specific parameterizations for each side.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exchange of ideas with participants sharing their individual approaches to parametrization. Some have found alternative formulas that work for their needs, indicating a productive exploration of the topic. However, there is no explicit consensus on a single method, as different participants express satisfaction with their own approaches.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express frustration with the lack of detailed explanations in their textbooks, noting that the provided formulas do not clarify the underlying procedures for parametrization.

Raziel2701
Messages
128
Reaction score
0
My book just gives me what each individual piece is but doesn't explain anything.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
there would be a heap of ways, but firstly why do you want & how do you want to...
 
if its for a line integral the standrad way would be to consider each side of the square as a line separately
 
The "individual pieces", I suspect, are the four sides of the square.

The "unit square" in the complex plane is probably the square with vertices at 0, 1, 1+ i, and i. The bottom side, from 0 to 1, could be parameterized as "t" with 0< t< 1. Obviously, when t= 0, that gives the point "0" and when t= 1 that gives the point "1".

The right side, from 1= 1+ 0i to 1+ i could be parameterized by "1+ ti" with 0< t< 1. When t= 0 that gives the point 1+0i= 1 and when t= 1, it gives 1+ 1i= 1+ i.

The top side, from 1+ i to i= 0+ i could be parameterized by "(1- t)+ i" with 0< t< 1. When t= 0 that gives the point (1- 0)+ i= 1+ i and when t= 1 it gives (1- 1)+ i= i.

Finally, the left side, from i to 0 could be parameterized by "(1- t)i" with 0< t< 1. When t= 0 that gives the point (1- 0)i= i and when t= 1 it gives (1- 1)i= 0.
 
I found a formula in my calc book. It parametrizes the lines from 0 to 1, and although I don't know how my complex analysis book parametrized the unit square, this formula works all right.

I needed the parametrization for some contour integrals and the book is unfortunately not self-contained so they just throw results instead of procedures. I really hate this book...
 
Yeah I got the same parametrization as you did HallsofIvy, the book does it differently though, but I don't care, my method works just as well.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K