How Do You Plot d sinθ = mλ for Interference Patterns?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CINA
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interference
CINA
Messages
60
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm doing a lab and it says:

Assume that on the double-slit plate, pattern A has exactly the slit separation printed on the plate. Shine the laser through pattern A onto a screen. Decide whether you will measure positions of maxima, minima, or both. Measure the positions of interference maxima/minima/both. Repeat several times for different maxima/minima and/or different plate-screen distances. Determine the wavelength of the laser by plotting your data and fitting a straight line using d sinθ = mλ and/or (m + ½)λ.

Homework Equations



d sinθ = mλ
L tanθ = y

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm just wondering how exactly one is supposed to plot d sinθ = mλ and fit a straight line through it? We know the d value, the L value, the m value, and the y values. The problem is I don't know what we are supposed to plot so that the slop of a line would be the wavelength. I'm thinking d*y/L = mλ ( using small angnle approximation). Would this work?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks like there are at least a couple of choices:

You could plot y vs. m, for fixed L.

Or y vs. L, for fixed m.

If both L and m were varied, plotting y/L vs. m should work too.​

In all cases, the slope can be determined from the d*y/L = mλ equation you have.

Hope that helps.

p.s. Yes, normally the sinθ≈θ approximation is valid for the double-slit experiment.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top