How Do You Solve a Spring-Damper System with a Piecewise Force Function?

  • Thread starter Thread starter aerandir4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    System
aerandir4
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Spring-Damper system has a force applied such that the formula f(t)= kx(t)+c(dx/dt) holds
Determine the resulting displacement x(t) and sketch the function.
What is the displacement at t=1 sec?

Homework Equations


k=10^4 Nm^-1
c=1.25x10^4 Nsm^-1
x(0)=0

the is also a graph that has time on the horizontal axis and f(t) on the vertical axis f(t). It goes up linearly from 0 to f(0.5)=100 and then linearly drops with negative gradient to 0 at f(1)=0 and then carries on at infinitely at f(t)=0 for t>1

The Attempt at a Solution



I think we have to define the graph first in three steps

0<t<0.5 f(t)=200t
0.5<t<1 f(t)=200(1-t)
t>1 f(t)=0

after this I'm confused on how to proceed. Initially I took each set of conditions and converted them to X(s) via laplace transforms then solved by partial fractions and then converted back to X(t). I'm not sure if this is the right method.

Another way would be to solve each condition by integration,
i.e. when 0<t<0.5 then f(t)=integral between 0 and 0.5 of exp^-st*200t dt
then substitute this value back into f(t) in the equation of motion.

some guidance would be nice.

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You broke up f(t) into three steps; can you guess an x(t) for each step that satisfies the constraint equation?
Once you've got this what is the most general solution of the constraint equation? You should be able to solve the problem now using the initial condition and continuity of x(t).

(Though I'm not sure if x(t) will satisfy the equation at .5 and 1).
 
fantispug said:
You broke up f(t) into three steps; can you guess an x(t) for each step that satisfies the constraint equation?
Once you've got this what is the most general solution of the constraint equation? You should be able to solve the problem now using the initial condition and continuity of x(t).

(Though I'm not sure if x(t) will satisfy the equation at .5 and 1).

between 0<t<0.5
i plugged in 200t=kx+c(dx/dt)
now---> 200/s^2=kX(s)+c[sX(s)-X(0)]
I re arranged in terms of X(s)=200/s^2*(k+cs)
after using partial fractions i get X(s)=-1/40s+1/50*s^2+1/40*(k/c+s)
which would give X(t)=-1/40+t/50+exp^(-k/c*t)/40

doing the same for 0.5<t<1

I get X(t)=1/200-t/250-exp^(-k/c*t)/200
i assume the third condition to be 0 as f(t)is 0 for t>1

am I going in the right direction up to now?

I didn't understand your last tip fully what do you mean by "general solution of the constraint equation"
what do I do for each x(t) equation?

many thanks
 
Yeah, it certainly looks like you're moving in the right direction. When I was talking about "general solution" I meant that a generic first order differential equation has a parameter family of solutions (i.e. you typically get a constant of integration that can be any number).Now suppose you've got an inhomogeneous linear differential equation; that is if D is some linear differential operator (here D=k+ c d/dt) and you want to solve
D X(t) = f(t) for some function f(t).
Now suppose we've got one solution X and we want to find another solution Y,
D X = f
D Y = f and so by linearity
D (Y-X) = 0. Thus any other solution is of the form X + U where D(U) = 0.

(To give you an example: Solve f'(t) = t. Well we know X(t)=t^2/2 is a solution, and any other solution is X + U, where U'(t) = 0, i.e. U = constant. So the general solution is t^2/2 + constant).

Now it looks like you've got one solution: given the above hints can you find the most general solution (i.e. the one with the arbitrary constant of integration). Continuity of X(t) at 0 and 0.5 should force a particular value of this constant of integration.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top