How Do You Solve Challenging Physics Problems in Nuclear Engineering Interviews?

  • Thread starter Thread starter beuller34
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Couple Energy
AI Thread Summary
To prepare for nuclear engineering interviews, it's essential to revisit fundamental physics concepts, especially if there's been a gap since last studying the subject. The discussion highlights two specific problems involving energy and motion, emphasizing the need to understand free body diagrams and projectile motion. Participants suggest that simply solving these problems may not provide the comprehensive physics knowledge required for more advanced questions. A recommendation is made to consult introductory physics textbooks for a broader understanding. Mastering these foundational concepts is crucial for success in the interview process.
beuller34
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi all, I have my interviews coming up in a bit to get into the Nuclear Engineering program with the Navy, and on one of the study guides, I was faced with these two simple energy problems, but could not figure them out for the life of me! (I graduated with my B.S. in Chemical Engineering, so I haven't taken physics in about 4 years... haha). They both sound something like this:

1. Given a block on an inclined plane with angle alpha, friction coefficient u, and the block moving with initial speed vo up the block. Draw the free body diagram, find the acceleration of the block, and determine how far the block will travel up the ramp before stopping.

2. You are given a cannon stuck at a 45 degree angle with the ground. You are 10m above the spot you want to hit and 1000m away. What muzzle velocity do you need to hit the target given a 1kg projectile? Say the projectile is faulty and doesn't explode, how much energy will the projectile have upon hitting the ground?

Any help on these would be greatly appreciated... Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just open any introductory physics text...studying these two problems will not give you the broad based physics you'll need for the next two questions...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top