How Do You Solve Complex Physics Problems Involving Newton's Laws?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving complex physics problems using Newton's laws, specifically involving a sailboat and a bird on a telephone wire. For the sailboat, the user is trying to calculate the resultant acceleration by resolving forces into components and applying the formula Fnet = ma, ultimately finding an acceleration of 3.4 m/s². The second problem involves determining the tension in a wire sagging due to a bird's weight, where the user correctly calculates the hypotenuse but needs guidance on finding the angle and tension. The solution involves using trigonometric relationships and free body diagrams to analyze the forces acting on the system. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of proper diagramming and component analysis in solving physics problems.
bigslowy
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
These problems are really giving me fits, I would really appreciate some help.

A 12200 kg sailboat experiences an eastward
force of 27400 N due to tide pushing its hull
while the wind pushes the sails with a force of
56200 N directed toward the northwest (45±
westward of North or 45± northward ofWest).
What is the magnitude of the resultant ac-
celeration of the sailboat?



I'm using Fr= square root of (Frx squared)+(Fry squared) but I'm still not getting it right. I'm thinking that maybe I drew the free body diagram wrong. Any help?

Now for this one

The distance between two telephone poles is
32 m. When a 1:15 kg bird lands on the
telephone wire midway between the poles, the
wire sags 0:182 m.
The acceleration of gravity is 9:8 m=s2 :
How much tension in the wire does the
bird produce? Ignore the weight of the wire.

So far I've drawn the diagram and got a hypotenuse of 16.001 m, but I'm unsure how to finish the problem.

Any help would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1. Find the magnitude using the cosine law.
2. use F=ma to find the magnitude of a.
It is easier to use the unit vector i and j. but i am afraid you haven't learned that yet. so we will approach it geometrically.
 

Attachments

  • Picture.GIF
    Picture.GIF
    1.9 KB · Views: 579
First problem (sail boat)

check the attachment

Fx = F(east) - F(northwest)Xcos45 = -12339 N
Fy = F(northwest)Xsin45 = 39739 N
Fnet = Squareroot of (Fx^2 + Fy^2)
then, Fnet = ma
a = Fnet/mass = 3.4 m/s
 

Attachments

  • sailboat problem.JPG
    sailboat problem.JPG
    3 KB · Views: 547
2nd problem

ok the hyp that you got is good.
a^2 + b^2 = c^2
a= 16
b = .182
c = 16.001 using the formula. Good you got until this point.

2nd step= get the angle theta. (see diagram)

90-tan (16/.182) = theta


step 3 = Get the tension by adding the Forces on the y axes. See diagram
 

Attachments

  • 2nd problem.JPG
    2nd problem.JPG
    5.5 KB · Views: 495
Free body diagram : Attached file.
 

Attachments

  • Picture.GIF
    Picture.GIF
    2.3 KB · Views: 572
of course, I didn't draw the other tension on the other side because is understood.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top