How Do You Solve for Theta in Degrees When Given a Cosine Squared Equation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter huskerfan5788
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    General Trig
huskerfan5788
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
This may seem really simple, but I just can't figure out how to do it.

Say you have an equation 0.651 = cos² (theta)

How would you solve for theta in degrees? I know that for cos (theta) you take the arccos, but what do you do when it is squared?

Thank you!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I don't know. Maybe take square roots of both sides first?
 
And after you take the square root of both sides, consider taking the arc cosine (also called inverse cosine) of both sides.
 
Be warned that taking the square root is not enough. You'll also need to take the negative square root if you don't want to lose information...
 
If you just treat it like a quadratic I don't think you will lose any information.
0.651 = cos²
cos² - 0.651 = 0
cos² - 0cos - 0.651 = 0

Then you can solve for cos(theta) = +/-Something via arccos. I guess that's really the same as what was mentioned above though.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top