How Do You Solve the Moving Pulley Problem with a 100 kg Sack for Equilibrium?

AI Thread Summary
To solve the moving pulley problem with a 100 kg sack, the equilibrium conditions require analyzing the forces acting on the system. The equations TABCosθ + TBCCosφ = 0 and TABSinθ + TBCSinφ = 980N are essential for determining the tensions in the cables. The length of cable ABC is 5 m, and the horizontal distance from point C to the pulley is given as 3.5 - x. The tension in the cable remains constant on both sides of the pulley, and the introduction of height components is necessary for a complete analysis. The discussion highlights the complexity of the problem, particularly with the introduction of new variables and the challenge of solving equations involving higher powers of x.
Jay9313
Messages
40
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://media.cheggcdn.com/media/76d/76dd5c56-43a5-44d3-b8b8-40ba63a9010a/phpYYNJyN.png

Cable ABC has a length of 5 m. Determine the position x and the tension developed in ABC required for equilibrium of the 100 kg sack. Neglect the size of the pulley


Homework Equations


TABCosθ + TBCCos\phi=0
TABSinθ + TBCSin\phi=980N
I also have the distance from C to the pulley (in x direction) is 3.5-x

The Attempt at a Solution


My attempt at the solution so far is
TABCosθ = TBCCos\phi
I can rearrange the trig functions themselves, but I'm missing a height component, but I don't even know if that's the right track.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have also managed to introduce a few new variables. I have introduced h+H=5 (The length of the rope) and y and y+0.75
 
Consider the 'free body' diagram for a thin vertical slice of the rope directly under the pulley (thin compared with radius of pulley). What does this tell you about the tension each side?
 
Tension is the same. I tried to find similar triangles and worked with them but I am getting equations with x^4.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top