How Do You Solve This High Pass Filter ODE Problem?

  • Thread starter Thread starter brad sue
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Signals System
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a high pass filter ODE, specifically the equation dx[t]/dt = y[t]/RC + dy[t]/dt. The initial solution provided involves an integral with x'[\lambda], but the task is to express y[t] as an integral of x[\lambda]. Participants suggest using integration by parts to achieve this, emphasizing that t is a constant during integration, not a variable. Clarifications highlight the importance of maintaining the form t - λ in the integral while recognizing that λ is the variable of integration. The conversation concludes with the poster planning to redo their computations based on the feedback received.
brad sue
Messages
270
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have this problem about signals that I have a little trouble to finish:
I attached a small figure of the circuit.
I cannot figure out the answer and I struggled for 2 days.

It is a High pass filter, and the ODE of the circuit is:

\frac{dx[t]}{dt}=\frac{y[t]}{RC}+ \frac{dy[t]}{dt}

the solution for the equation is (according to the hint given by the homework):
y[t]=\int_{-\infty}^{t} e^{-(t-\lambda)/\tau}x'[\lambda] \,d\lambda (1)

But the question said:
Find the solution of the ODE to obtain y[t] as some integral of x[t].

This implies taking away the x'[\lambda] in (1) and replace by x[\lambda].

the hint suggested us to use the integration by part to the solution y[t].
I chose x'[t] for v' and the exponetial function as u.
\int_{a}^{b}u.v'd\lambda =[u.v] -\int_{a}^{b}u'. vd\lambda


Doing this, I got:
y[t]=x[t]+\lambda\int_{-\infty}^{t}x(\lambda)e^{-(t-\lambda)/\tau} \,d\lambda

My problem is that by intergrating, even though I took away what I wanted, I have introduced the variable t. I don't know if it is a problem. I am not sure of the answer.

My second question is the following:
Find the impulse response function h[t] so that the solution is has the form:
y[t]=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}h(t-\lambda) x(\lambda) \,d\lambda

Hint: if you find a lonely x(t), remenber that: x[t]=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\delta(t-\lambda) x(\lambda) \,d\lambda

\delta(t) is the delta function.


please can I have help with this problem?
Thank you
 

Attachments

Engineering news on Phys.org
brad sue said:
Hi,

I have this problem about signals that I have a little trouble to finish:
I attached a small figure of the circuit.
I cannot figure out the answer and I struggled for 2 days.

It is a High pass filter, and the ODE of the circuit is:

\frac{dx[t]}{dt}=\frac{y[t]}{RC}+ \frac{dy[t]}{dt}

the solution for the equation is (according to the hint given by the homework):
y[t]=\int_{-\infty}^{t} e^{-(t-\lambda)/\tau}x'[\lambda] \,d\lambda (1)

But the question said:
Find the solution of the ODE to obtain y[t] as some integral of x[t].

This implies taking away the x'[\lambda] in (1) and replace by x[\lambda].

the hint suggested us to use the integration by part to the solution y[t].
I chose x'[t] for v' and the exponetial function as u.
\int_{a}^{b}u.v'd\lambda =[u.v] -\int_{a}^{b}u'. vd\lambda


Doing this, I got:
y[t]=x[t]+\lambda\int_{-\infty}^{t}x(\lambda)e^{-(t-\lambda)/\tau} \,d\lambda

My problem is that by intergrating, even though I took away what I wanted, I have introduced the variable t. I don't know if it is a problem. I am not sure of the answer.

My second question is the following:
Find the impulse response function h[t] so that the solution is has the form:
y[t]=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}h(t-\lambda) x(\lambda) \,d\lambda

Hint: if you find a lonely x(t), remenber that: x[t]=\int_{-\infty}^{+\infty}\delta(t-\lambda) x(\lambda) \,d\lambda

\delta(t) is the delta function.


please can I have help with this problem?
Thank you

In the integral t is not a variable, it is a constant, since the integration variable is lambda. You can make e^{-(t-\lambda)} = e^{-t}e^\lambda then take e^{-t} outside of the integral.
 
Thank you CEL but I think that I need to keep the form so that I always get the t-\lambda as argument.
 
brad sue said:
Thank you CEL but I think that I need to keep the form so that I always get the t-\lambda as argument.

Even if you want to keep the form t-\lambda, t is still a constant and not a variable. The only variable is still \lambda .
 
When one does

y[t]=\int_{-\infty}^{t} e^{-(t-\lambda)/\tau}x'[\lambda] \,d\lambda

the integral involves the frequency domain, and lambda (frequency) is the variable, not t.

Frquency domain is the basis of Fourier and Laplace transforms and analyses, as opposed to the time-domain.

If x(t) = eat, then x'(t) = a eat = a x(t) assuming that x'(t) = d x(t) / dt

and the other part of that is d [x(t)]/da = t eat = t x(t)
 
Last edited:
Thank you Astronuc and CEL,

I 'll redo my computations. I will let you know if I still have an issue.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top