Agnostic
- 110
- 0
I was thinking alternating series test, but can't that only be used for testing for convergence, not for testing divergence?
Hurkyl said:How about the divergence test?![]()
LeonhardEuler said:You'll have to be more specific. The convergence of what? The sequence of terms, a_n=i^n, the series, \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}i^n, or some sequence or series that just has i^n as one term? I can tell you right now, the first two diverge.
i^n is not an indeterminant form.Agnostic said:The divergence test doesn't work for indeterminant forms.
The divergence test doesn't work for indeterminant forms.
Oh, that's simple. Use the divergence test as Hurkyl suggested. Do the terms in the series approach zero as n approaches infinty?Agnostic said:I must prove that \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}i^n diverges.
Or rather, I must prove wheter or not its convergent of divergent. I know its divergent, but I still have to prove it.
Right, exactly!Agnostic said:The limit of i^n as n goes to infinity doesn't have a solution does it?
LeonhardEuler said:Oh, that's simple. Use the divergence test as Hurkyl suggested. Do the terms in the series approach zero as n approaches infinty?
LeonhardEuler said:Right, exactly!
So the limit doesn't exist. Then can it equal zero?Agnostic said:No, they alternate ... i,-1,-i,1,i,-1,...
No, an indeterminant form is something like \frac{0}{0}, or \frac{\infty}{\infty}, or 1^{\infty}. A non-existant limit is just a non-existant limit.Agnostic said:But that is not the same as saying indeterminant form?
But that is not the same as saying indeterminant form?