How Do You Verify Equations for a Balancing Robot?

  • Thread starter Thread starter auto
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Robot
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on verifying the mechanical equations for a balancing robot, specifically one that maintains its upright position by controlling motors based on the center of mass. The user has derived equations for both the body and wheels but is uncertain about their accuracy. The request for validation highlights the importance of correct mathematical modeling in robotics, particularly in applications involving dynamic stability.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newtonian mechanics
  • Familiarity with control systems in robotics
  • Knowledge of kinematics and dynamics
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical modeling
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of dynamic stability in robotics
  • Study the derivation of equations of motion for robotic systems
  • Explore control algorithms for balancing robots, such as PID control
  • Examine case studies of similar balancing robots for practical insights
USEFUL FOR

Robotics engineers, mechanical engineers, students in robotics courses, and hobbyists building balancing robots will benefit from this discussion.

auto
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am building a balancing robot like the one here:
http://www.geology.smu.edu/~dpa-www/robo/nbot/

It's basically a body mounted on two wheels and its purpose is to control the motors as to keep the wheels under the center of mass and therefore keep the body in an upward position.

I wrote the mechanical equations for the body and for the wheels separately, but I am not sure if they are correct. I need someone to check them, please.

Homework Equations


Are the equations in the attached photos correct?

The Attempt at a Solution


<see the attached photos>
 

Attachments

  • DSCF7313.JPG
    DSCF7313.JPG
    21.5 KB · Views: 488
  • DSCF7315.JPG
    DSCF7315.JPG
    20.4 KB · Views: 501
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Scraping the J x Theta derived twice x ...
from the first two equations in the first pic.

Those were wrong.



Are there any other mistakes?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K