How Does a Ball's Mass Affect Its Final Velocity After Colliding with a Plank?

  • Thread starter Thread starter WannabeNewton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on how the mass of a ball affects its final velocity after colliding with a plank on a frictionless plane. The conservation of linear and angular momentum is applied to derive the final velocity, with the result showing that if the ball's mass equals the plank's mass, the final velocity is v_f = 3/5 v_0. Participants debate whether the ball should bounce back or continue moving forward after the collision, noting that the outcome depends on the mass ratio. It is emphasized that assumptions about the direction of the final velocity should be avoided to allow the calculations to dictate the result naturally. Ultimately, the direction of the final velocity should be determined by the chosen coordinate system and mass values.
WannabeNewton
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
5,848
Reaction score
552

Homework Statement


A plank of length 2l and mass M lies on a friction-less plane. A ball of mass m and speed v_{0} strikes its end as shown. Find the final velocity v_{f} of the ball assuming mechanical energy is conserved and v_{f} is along the original line of motion. Ans. clue. For m = M, v_{f} = \frac{3}{5}v_{0}.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


Ok so because \sum F = \partial _{t}P = 0 and \sum \tau = \partial _{t}L = 0 (internal collision forces cancel as per Newton's 3rd law) we can use conservation of both linear and angular momentum. We are free to choose a viable coordinate system so any coordinate system with its origin fixed on the line of motion of the point particle of mass m will do the trick. In this frame, L_{0} = 0 because the plank is initially at rest and the particle's momentum is directed parallel to its position vector with respect to the origin in this frame. Since the question states that even after the collision the particle moves along the same line of motion, the angular momentum after comes entirely from the plank which is now rotating as well as translating in some form so L_{f} = I_{com}\omega(-\hat{k}) + lMV(\hat{k}) = (lMV - \frac{1}{3}Ml^{2}\omega)\hat{k} = 0 and we get that \omega = \frac{3V}{l}. We also have conservation of linear momentum and here is where I got confused. I'll do as I did on my note book and state my concern after: mv_{0} = -mv_{f} + MV so V^{2} = \frac{m^{2}}{M^{2}}(v_{0} + v_{f})^{2} and using this together with the expression for the angular velocity of the plank after the collision I was able to simply the conservation of mechanical energy equation, \frac{1}{2}mv_{0}^{2} = \frac{1}{2}mv_{f}^{2} + \frac{1}{2}MV^{2} + \frac{1}{2}I_{com}w^{2}, down to (1 + \frac{4m}{M})v_{f}^{2} + 8\frac{m}{M}v_{0}v_{f} + (\frac{4m}{M} - 1)v_{0}^{2} = 0 which gives the solutions v_{f} = -{v_{0}\frac{(\frac{4m}{M} \pm 1)}{(\frac{4m}{M} + 1)}}. If I use m = M for the Ans. clue. then I get v_{f} = -\frac{3}{5}v_{0} or v_{f} = -v_{0}. My questions are these: I assumed at the beggining that the point particle would shoot backwards after colliding with the plank hence the negative sign but if I assume it keeps going in the same direction and do everything up till now the exact same way I get the right answer v_{f} = \frac{3}{5}v_{0} but it makes intuitive sense to me that the particle would bounce back after hitting the plank thus causing the plank to rotate, and translate in the opposite direction; why would the particle keep moving forward? Secondly, there is the case v0 = vf and I don't see a justification for why this solution can be eliminated other than the fact that it would be a trivial solution where nothing at all happens to the plank. Thank you.
 

Attachments

  • kleppner 6.37.jpg
    kleppner 6.37.jpg
    20.5 KB · Views: 753
Physics news on Phys.org
WannabeNewton said:
I assumed at the beggining that the point particle would shoot backwards after colliding with the plank hence the negative sign but if I assume it keeps going in the same direction and do everything up till now the exact same way I get the right answer v_{f} = \frac{3}{5}v_{0} but it makes intuitive sense to me that the particle would bounce back after hitting the plank thus causing the plank to rotate, and translate in the opposite direction; why would the particle keep moving forward? Secondly, there is the case v0 = vf and I don't see a justification for why this solution can be eliminated other than the fact that it would be a trivial solution where nothing at all happens to the plank. Thank you.

Whether the colliding ball bounces back or moves in the original direction depends on the ratio of masses. Remember the case of two colliding point masses. When one is in rest, the lighter incoming ball bounces back, one with equal mass stops and a heavier one moves in the original direction. The masses are equal here. in case m/M<1/4 the ball would bounce back.

You get vf=vo a possible solution. You got vf from the conservation equations and they are also valid when nothing happens: the ball does not touch the plank.

ehild
 
ehild said:
Whether the colliding ball bounces back or moves in the original direction depends on the ratio of masses. Remember the case of two colliding point masses. When one is in rest, the lighter incoming ball bounces back, one with equal mass stops and a heavier one moves in the original direction. The masses are equal here. in case m/M<1/4 the ball would bounce back.

You get vf=vo a possible solution. You got vf from the conservation equations and they are also valid when nothing happens: the ball does not touch the plank.

ehild

Thank you. So when I start I should not assume anything about the direction of the final velocity and that way its sign will come naturally out of what I choose for M,m?
 
WannabeNewton said:
Thank you. So when I start I should not assume anything about the direction of the final velocity and that way its sign will come naturally out of what I choose for M,m?

Yes. Decide what direction you choose as positive, and do not assume anything about the direction of the unknown velocity. It will come out.

ehild
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top