How Does a Chemical Clock Relate to Entropy?

AI Thread Summary
A chemical clock involves reactions that display periodic oscillations before reaching equilibrium, driven by the kinetics of chemical reactions. The discussion highlights that while chemical clocks exhibit chaotic behavior, this is distinct from entropy, which is often associated with disorder. There is no unique relationship between chemical clock reactions and entropy compared to other chemical reactions. The dynamics of these reactions can be described using differential equations, similar to concepts in chaos theory. Overall, the connection between chemical clocks and entropy is not particularly significant.
novince
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
hi
please give some me insight into the working of a chemical clock and its relation with entropy

i don't really know if this is has anything to do with physics but please do help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, this is more a chemistry question, but that's fine by me anyway. The mods might want to move it to the 'chemistry' section though.

I don't quite see what you mean. More specifically, I don't see any particular relationship between 'chemical clock' reactions and entropy as compared to any other chemical reaction.

Are you sure you're not conflating entropy, which is often equated with disorder, with chaos, which is a behaviour of dynamical systems exhibited in 'chemical clock' reactions?

The short explanation for 'chemical clocks' is that the kinetics of chemical reactions in general are differential equations (the rate at which something reacts tends to depend on its concentration). With a set of competing reaction, you end up with a set of coupled diff. equations, which can often display chaotic behaviour; in the case of the 'chemical clock', you get large periodic oscillations back and forth before equilibrium is reached. Not unsimilar to the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorenz_attractor" of Chaos theory.

But entropy-wise I don't see that there's anything particularly distinctive going on.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top