How Does a Rod's Angle Change in an Accelerating Car?

AI Thread Summary
In an accelerating car, a uniform thin rod pivoted at one end experiences a change in angle due to the car's acceleration. The equilibrium angle \Theta between the rod and the car's top can be determined by equating the fictitious force acting on the rod with its weight, leading to a straightforward solution. For small displacements \Phi from equilibrium, the rod's motion tends to return to its equilibrium position, although the vertical motion remains consistent due to the small angle approximation. The discussion highlights the challenges of solving the differential equation for part B, indicating a lack of familiarity with such methods among participants. Overall, the thread emphasizes the relationship between acceleration and the rod's angle in a dynamic system.
davesface
Messages
97
Reaction score
2
A uniform thin rod of length L and mass M is pivoted at one end. The pivot is attached to the top of a car accelerating at rate A.

a.) What is the equilibrium value of the angle \Theta between the rod and the top of the car?

Honestly, I'm not entirely sure what the question even wants me to find. Playing the problem out in my mind, it seems like the angle would just continue to increase at a constant rate as the car accelerates with a constant rate A, but clearly this is not the case.

b.) Suppose that the rod is displaced a small angle \Phi from equilibrium. What is its motion for small \Phi?

I would assume that the motion would be towards equilibrium, although the vertical component of motion for the rod itself should still be the same, as the approximation cos\Phi=1 should hold for small values of \Phi.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi davesface! :smile:

Let's do a.) first …
davesface said:
A uniform thin rod of length L and mass M is pivoted at one end. The pivot is attached to the top of a car accelerating at rate A.

a.) What is the equilibrium value of the angle \Theta between the rod and the top of the car?

Hint: in equilibrium, the acceleration of the end of the rod will be the same as the acceleration of the car.

So use good ol' Newton's second law :smile:
 
OK, part A was a lot easier than I thought, and all I did was set the fictional force backwards equal to the force of weight and solve for theta.

Turns out that part B would've required us to solve a differential equation, which no one knows how to do. Thanks for the response, though.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top